Insights into the experiences of patients with cancer in London: framework analysis of free-text data from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/2013 from the two London Integrated Cancer Systems
Insights into the experiences of patients with cancer in London: framework analysis of free-text data from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/2013 from the two London Integrated Cancer Systems
Objective
To shed light on experiences of patients with cancer in London National Health Service (NHS) trusts that may not be fully captured in national survey data, to inform improvement action plans by these trusts.
Design
Framework analysis of free-text data from 2012/2013 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (NCPES) from the 2 London Integrated Cancer Systems.
Setting and participants
Patients with a cancer diagnosis treated by the NHS across 27 trusts in London.
Main outcome measures
Free-text data received from patients categorised into what patients found good about their cancer care and what could be improved.
Methods
Using Framework analysis, a thematic framework was created for 15?403 comments from over 6500 patients. Themes were identified across the London data set, by tumour group and by trust.
Results
Two-thirds of free-text comments from patients in London were positive and one-third of those related to the good quality of care those patients received. However, the majority of comments for improvement related to quality of care, with a focus on poor care, poor communication and waiting times in outpatient departments. Additionally, 577 patients (9% of those who returned free-text data in London) commented on issues pertaining to the questionnaire itself. Some patients who experienced care from multiple trusts were unclear on how to complete the questionnaire for the single trust whose care they were asked to comment on, others said the questions did not fit their experiences.
Conclusions
NCPES free-text analysis can shed light on the experiences of patients that closed questions might not reveal. It further indicates that there are issues with the survey itself, in terms of ambiguities in the questionnaire and difficulties in identifying patients within specific trusts. Both of these issues have the potential to contribute to knowledge and understanding of the uses and limitations of free-text data in improving cancer services.
1-11
Wiseman, Theresa
e3ff42ae-97ef-4640-af3d-40eeae830df9
Lucas, Grace
c26bafa2-1ccc-4bf9-bbf4-b43314339a3e
Sangha, Amrit
d9260c3c-a703-4fb7-9035-84624f098cb4
Randolph, Anuska
ffbc691b-44a0-4475-9bda-f9f19ae63a66
Stapleton, Sarah
13e4d829-f059-42c8-bce7-4ce4875394c9
Pattison, Natalie
d1daa2dc-3ece-4b9b-914a-0e463b77d414
O'Gara, Geraldine
8b8c9eee-a33a-471a-9f64-a98e839c7331
Harris, Katherine
5fccf182-b511-44ef-9415-eb3e0ca8697e
Pritchard-Jones, Kathy
7ae944bd-77e5-426e-800d-ee291c8b81d6
Dolan, Shelley
40484f16-981c-4345-8979-8cb36026e4e7
19 October 2015
Wiseman, Theresa
e3ff42ae-97ef-4640-af3d-40eeae830df9
Lucas, Grace
c26bafa2-1ccc-4bf9-bbf4-b43314339a3e
Sangha, Amrit
d9260c3c-a703-4fb7-9035-84624f098cb4
Randolph, Anuska
ffbc691b-44a0-4475-9bda-f9f19ae63a66
Stapleton, Sarah
13e4d829-f059-42c8-bce7-4ce4875394c9
Pattison, Natalie
d1daa2dc-3ece-4b9b-914a-0e463b77d414
O'Gara, Geraldine
8b8c9eee-a33a-471a-9f64-a98e839c7331
Harris, Katherine
5fccf182-b511-44ef-9415-eb3e0ca8697e
Pritchard-Jones, Kathy
7ae944bd-77e5-426e-800d-ee291c8b81d6
Dolan, Shelley
40484f16-981c-4345-8979-8cb36026e4e7
Wiseman, Theresa, Lucas, Grace, Sangha, Amrit, Randolph, Anuska, Stapleton, Sarah, Pattison, Natalie, O'Gara, Geraldine, Harris, Katherine, Pritchard-Jones, Kathy and Dolan, Shelley
(2015)
Insights into the experiences of patients with cancer in London: framework analysis of free-text data from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/2013 from the two London Integrated Cancer Systems.
BMJ Open, 5 (10), .
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007792).
(PMID:26482767)
Abstract
Objective
To shed light on experiences of patients with cancer in London National Health Service (NHS) trusts that may not be fully captured in national survey data, to inform improvement action plans by these trusts.
Design
Framework analysis of free-text data from 2012/2013 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (NCPES) from the 2 London Integrated Cancer Systems.
Setting and participants
Patients with a cancer diagnosis treated by the NHS across 27 trusts in London.
Main outcome measures
Free-text data received from patients categorised into what patients found good about their cancer care and what could be improved.
Methods
Using Framework analysis, a thematic framework was created for 15?403 comments from over 6500 patients. Themes were identified across the London data set, by tumour group and by trust.
Results
Two-thirds of free-text comments from patients in London were positive and one-third of those related to the good quality of care those patients received. However, the majority of comments for improvement related to quality of care, with a focus on poor care, poor communication and waiting times in outpatient departments. Additionally, 577 patients (9% of those who returned free-text data in London) commented on issues pertaining to the questionnaire itself. Some patients who experienced care from multiple trusts were unclear on how to complete the questionnaire for the single trust whose care they were asked to comment on, others said the questions did not fit their experiences.
Conclusions
NCPES free-text analysis can shed light on the experiences of patients that closed questions might not reveal. It further indicates that there are issues with the survey itself, in terms of ambiguities in the questionnaire and difficulties in identifying patients within specific trusts. Both of these issues have the potential to contribute to knowledge and understanding of the uses and limitations of free-text data in improving cancer services.
Text
Insights into the experiences of patients.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 July 2015
Published date: 19 October 2015
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 397104
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/397104
PURE UUID: e0daf69f-7020-42a3-957d-ab1a39ee7d73
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Jun 2016 11:20
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 01:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Theresa Wiseman
Author:
Grace Lucas
Author:
Amrit Sangha
Author:
Anuska Randolph
Author:
Sarah Stapleton
Author:
Natalie Pattison
Author:
Geraldine O'Gara
Author:
Katherine Harris
Author:
Kathy Pritchard-Jones
Author:
Shelley Dolan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics