Freedom to Learn: The threat to student academic freedom and why it needs to be reclaimed
Freedom to Learn: The threat to student academic freedom and why it needs to be reclaimed
The freedom of students to learn at university is being eroded by a performative culture that fails to respect their rights to engage and develop as autonomous adults. Instead, students are being restricted in how they learn, when they learn and what they learn by the so-called student engagement movement. Compulsory attendance registers, class contribution grading, group project work and reflective learning exercises based on expectations of self-disclosure and confession take little account of the rights of students or individual differences between them. This new hidden university curriculum is intolerant of students who may prefer to learn informally, are reticent, shy, or simply value their privacy. Three forms of student performativity have arisen – bodily, participative and emotional – which threaten the freedom to learn.
Key themes include:
A re-imagining of student academic freedom
The democratic student experience
Challenging assumptions of the student engagement movement An examination of university policies and practices
Freedom to Learn offers a radically new perspective on academic freedom from a student rights standpoint. It analyzes the effects of performative expectations on students, drawing on the distinction between negative and positive rights to re-frame student academic freedom. It argues that students need to be thought of as scholars with rights and that the phrase ‘student-centered’ learning needs to be reclaimed to reflect its original intention to allow students to develop as persons. Student rights – to non-indoctrination, reticence, in choosing how to learn, and in being treated like an adult – ought to be central to this process in fostering a democratic rather than authoritarian culture of learning and teaching at university.
Written for an international readership, this book will be of great interest to anyone involved in higher education, policy and practice, drawing on a wide range of historical and contemporary literature related to sociology, philosophy and higher education studies.
Macfarlane, Bruce
3e2b9eb0-1772-4642-bb51-ab49cc5b748c
24 August 2016
Macfarlane, Bruce
3e2b9eb0-1772-4642-bb51-ab49cc5b748c
Macfarlane, Bruce
(2016)
Freedom to Learn: The threat to student academic freedom and why it needs to be reclaimed
(Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) series),
New York, US.
Routledge, 152pp.
Abstract
The freedom of students to learn at university is being eroded by a performative culture that fails to respect their rights to engage and develop as autonomous adults. Instead, students are being restricted in how they learn, when they learn and what they learn by the so-called student engagement movement. Compulsory attendance registers, class contribution grading, group project work and reflective learning exercises based on expectations of self-disclosure and confession take little account of the rights of students or individual differences between them. This new hidden university curriculum is intolerant of students who may prefer to learn informally, are reticent, shy, or simply value their privacy. Three forms of student performativity have arisen – bodily, participative and emotional – which threaten the freedom to learn.
Key themes include:
A re-imagining of student academic freedom
The democratic student experience
Challenging assumptions of the student engagement movement An examination of university policies and practices
Freedom to Learn offers a radically new perspective on academic freedom from a student rights standpoint. It analyzes the effects of performative expectations on students, drawing on the distinction between negative and positive rights to re-frame student academic freedom. It argues that students need to be thought of as scholars with rights and that the phrase ‘student-centered’ learning needs to be reclaimed to reflect its original intention to allow students to develop as persons. Student rights – to non-indoctrination, reticence, in choosing how to learn, and in being treated like an adult – ought to be central to this process in fostering a democratic rather than authoritarian culture of learning and teaching at university.
Written for an international readership, this book will be of great interest to anyone involved in higher education, policy and practice, drawing on a wide range of historical and contemporary literature related to sociology, philosophy and higher education studies.
Text
Freedom to Leam Final MS.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 24 August 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 398375
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/398375
PURE UUID: eb236bdd-397e-4c2f-8eab-118e15ef4ee1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Jul 2016 10:38
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 01:33
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Bruce Macfarlane
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics