Three-dimensional geological modelling of anthropogenic deposits at small urban sites: a case study from Sheepcote Valley, Brighton, UK
Three-dimensional geological modelling of anthropogenic deposits at small urban sites: a case study from Sheepcote Valley, Brighton, UK
Improvements in computing speed and capacity and the increasing collection and digitisation of geological data now allow geoscientists to produce meaningful 3D spatial models of the shallow subsurface in many large urban areas, to predict ground conditions and reduce risk and uncertainty in urban planning. It is not yet clear how useful this 3D modelling approach is at smaller urban scales, where poorly characterised anthropogenic deposits (artificial/made ground and fill) form the dominant subsurface material and where the availability of borehole and other geological data is less comprehensive. This is important as it is these smaller urban sites, with complex site history, which frequently form the focus of urban regeneration and redevelopment schemes. This paper examines the extent to which the 3D modelling approach previously utilised at large urban scales can be extended to smaller less well-characterised urban sites, using a historic landfill site in Sheepcote Valley, Brighton, UK as a case study. Two 3D models were generated and compared using GSI3D™ software, one using borehole data only, one combining borehole data with local geological maps and results from a desk study (involving collation of available site data, including ground contour plans). These models clearly delimit the overall subsurface geology at the site, and allow visualisation and modelling of the anthropogenic deposits present. Shallow geophysical data collected from the site partially validate the 3D modelled data, and can improve GSI3D™ outputs where boundaries of anthropogenic deposits may not be clearly defined by surface, contour or borehole data. Attribution of geotechnical and geochemical properties to the 3D model is problematic without intrusive investigations and sampling. However, combining available borehole data, shallow geophysical methods and site histories may allow attribution of generic fill properties, and consequent reduction of urban development risk and uncertainty.
3D modelling, Landfill, Urban geology, Anthropogenic deposits, Risk management
628-634
Tame, C.
020f61a8-a64c-48b6-ae6e-9bc3e0ac95ad
Cundy, A.B.
994fdc96-2dce-40f4-b74b-dc638286eb08
Royse, K.R.
6db665bb-4c39-4102-83c8-6f97240c02c8
Smith, M.
79b50004-117c-487a-9ce5-8277706290c0
Moles, N.R.
0b960abc-f1b5-4ee9-8413-145a4a44a4b6
15 November 2013
Tame, C.
020f61a8-a64c-48b6-ae6e-9bc3e0ac95ad
Cundy, A.B.
994fdc96-2dce-40f4-b74b-dc638286eb08
Royse, K.R.
6db665bb-4c39-4102-83c8-6f97240c02c8
Smith, M.
79b50004-117c-487a-9ce5-8277706290c0
Moles, N.R.
0b960abc-f1b5-4ee9-8413-145a4a44a4b6
Tame, C., Cundy, A.B., Royse, K.R., Smith, M. and Moles, N.R.
(2013)
Three-dimensional geological modelling of anthropogenic deposits at small urban sites: a case study from Sheepcote Valley, Brighton, UK.
Journal of Environmental Management, 129, .
(doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.030).
Abstract
Improvements in computing speed and capacity and the increasing collection and digitisation of geological data now allow geoscientists to produce meaningful 3D spatial models of the shallow subsurface in many large urban areas, to predict ground conditions and reduce risk and uncertainty in urban planning. It is not yet clear how useful this 3D modelling approach is at smaller urban scales, where poorly characterised anthropogenic deposits (artificial/made ground and fill) form the dominant subsurface material and where the availability of borehole and other geological data is less comprehensive. This is important as it is these smaller urban sites, with complex site history, which frequently form the focus of urban regeneration and redevelopment schemes. This paper examines the extent to which the 3D modelling approach previously utilised at large urban scales can be extended to smaller less well-characterised urban sites, using a historic landfill site in Sheepcote Valley, Brighton, UK as a case study. Two 3D models were generated and compared using GSI3D™ software, one using borehole data only, one combining borehole data with local geological maps and results from a desk study (involving collation of available site data, including ground contour plans). These models clearly delimit the overall subsurface geology at the site, and allow visualisation and modelling of the anthropogenic deposits present. Shallow geophysical data collected from the site partially validate the 3D modelled data, and can improve GSI3D™ outputs where boundaries of anthropogenic deposits may not be clearly defined by surface, contour or borehole data. Attribution of geotechnical and geochemical properties to the 3D model is problematic without intrusive investigations and sampling. However, combining available borehole data, shallow geophysical methods and site histories may allow attribution of generic fill properties, and consequent reduction of urban development risk and uncertainty.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 15 November 2013
Keywords:
3D modelling, Landfill, Urban geology, Anthropogenic deposits, Risk management
Organisations:
Geochemistry
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 399284
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/399284
ISSN: 0301-4797
PURE UUID: df760cf5-9bdf-405c-b40e-23849ee07385
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Aug 2016 12:59
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 02:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
C. Tame
Author:
K.R. Royse
Author:
M. Smith
Author:
N.R. Moles
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics