Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues
Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues
We investigate how different depth cues are combined when one cue is ambiguous. Convex and concave surfaces produce similar texture projections at large viewing distances. Our study considered unambiguous disparity information and its combination with ambiguous texture information. Specifically, we asked whether disparity and texture were processed separately, before linear combination of shape estimates, or jointly, such that disparity disambiguated the texture information. Vertical ridges of various depths were presented stereoscopically. Their texture was consistent (in terms of maximum likelihood) with both a convex and a concave ridge. Disparity was consistent with either a convex or concave ridge. In a separate experiment the stimuli were defined solely by texture (monocular viewing). Under monocular viewing observers consistently reported the convex interpretation of the texture cue. However, in stereoscopic stimuli, texture information modulated shape from disparity in a way inconsistent with simple linear combination. When disparity indicated a concave surface, a texture pattern perceived as highly convex when viewed monocularly caused the stimulus to appear more concave than a “flat” texture pattern. Our data confirm that different cues can disambiguate each other. Data from both experiments are well modeled by a Bayesian approach incorporating a prior for convexity.
cue-combination, depth, texture, stereo, disparity, bayes, bayesian
921-929
Adams, Wendy J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
Mamassian, Pascal
c8cd94cf-3645-4f60-826c-0d1ab349bb00
1 November 2004
Adams, Wendy J.
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
Mamassian, Pascal
c8cd94cf-3645-4f60-826c-0d1ab349bb00
Adams, Wendy J. and Mamassian, Pascal
(2004)
Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues.
Journal of Vision, 4 (10), .
(doi:10.1167/4.10.7).
Abstract
We investigate how different depth cues are combined when one cue is ambiguous. Convex and concave surfaces produce similar texture projections at large viewing distances. Our study considered unambiguous disparity information and its combination with ambiguous texture information. Specifically, we asked whether disparity and texture were processed separately, before linear combination of shape estimates, or jointly, such that disparity disambiguated the texture information. Vertical ridges of various depths were presented stereoscopically. Their texture was consistent (in terms of maximum likelihood) with both a convex and a concave ridge. Disparity was consistent with either a convex or concave ridge. In a separate experiment the stimuli were defined solely by texture (monocular viewing). Under monocular viewing observers consistently reported the convex interpretation of the texture cue. However, in stereoscopic stimuli, texture information modulated shape from disparity in a way inconsistent with simple linear combination. When disparity indicated a concave surface, a texture pattern perceived as highly convex when viewed monocularly caused the stimulus to appear more concave than a “flat” texture pattern. Our data confirm that different cues can disambiguate each other. Data from both experiments are well modeled by a Bayesian approach incorporating a prior for convexity.
Text
39948.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 1 November 2004
Keywords:
cue-combination, depth, texture, stereo, disparity, bayes, bayesian
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 39948
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/39948
ISSN: 1534-7362
PURE UUID: c4b72cd0-3e83-4d2c-af5f-56f1d7213601
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Pascal Mamassian
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics