The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interpreting influence: towards reflexivity in penal policy?

Interpreting influence: towards reflexivity in penal policy?
Interpreting influence: towards reflexivity in penal policy?
This chapter explores the contribution to be made by interpretive political analysis (IPA) in understanding the extent to which participants in penal policymaking can be considered to be reflexive. Further, it considers the extent to which IPA might facilitate the improvement of reflexivity amongst penal policymakers. Relevant forms of reflexivity are first set out. Research conducted for the monograph Dangerous Politics (Annison, 2015) is then drawn upon in order to explore this issue empirically. In closing, the potential value of IPA to the improvement of penal policymaking, via a promotion of individual and collective reflexivity, is discussed.
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Annison, Harry
91ee5a4a-811e-4b57-9fd4-df643465b2a1
Armstrong, Sarah
Blaustein, Jarrett
Henry, Alistair
Annison, Harry
91ee5a4a-811e-4b57-9fd4-df643465b2a1
Armstrong, Sarah
Blaustein, Jarrett
Henry, Alistair

Annison, Harry (2017) Interpreting influence: towards reflexivity in penal policy? In, Armstrong, Sarah, Blaustein, Jarrett and Henry, Alistair (eds.) Reflexivity and Criminal Justice. Basingstoke, GB, Palgrave Macmillan UK (doi:10.1057/978-1-137-54642-5).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

This chapter explores the contribution to be made by interpretive political analysis (IPA) in understanding the extent to which participants in penal policymaking can be considered to be reflexive. Further, it considers the extent to which IPA might facilitate the improvement of reflexivity amongst penal policymakers. Relevant forms of reflexivity are first set out. Research conducted for the monograph Dangerous Politics (Annison, 2015) is then drawn upon in order to explore this issue empirically. In closing, the potential value of IPA to the improvement of penal policymaking, via a promotion of individual and collective reflexivity, is discussed.

PDF Annison_Interpreting_Influence_draft_for_posting - Author's Original
Download (223kB)

More information

Published date: 2017
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 399532
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/399532
PURE UUID: a8ac5599-6482-41b7-b66c-ceb99fde4faa
ORCID for Harry Annison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6042-038X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Aug 2016 10:38
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 18:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Harry Annison ORCID iD
Editor: Sarah Armstrong
Editor: Jarrett Blaustein
Editor: Alistair Henry

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×