The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients
Background

Laparoscopy is widely accepted as a feasible option for distal pancreatectomy. However, the experience in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is limited to a small number of studies, reported by expert centers. The present study aimed to evaluate perioperative and oncological outcomes after LDP for PDAC in a large, multicenter cohort of patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the data on 196 patients with histologically verified PDAC, operated at Oslo University Hospital—Rikshospitalet (Oslo, Norway), Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea), Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (Paris, France) and University Hospital Southampton (Southampton, UK) between January 2002 and April 2015 was conducted. The patients with standard (SLDP) and extended (i.e., en bloc with adjacent organ, ELDP) resections were compared in terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes.

Results

Out of 196 LDP procedures, 191 (97.4 %) were completed through laparoscopy, while five (2.6 %) were converted to open surgery. ELDP was performed in 30 (15.7 %) cases. Sixty-one (31.9 %) patients experienced postoperative complications, including 48 (25.1 %) with pancreatic fistula. The rate of clinically relevant fistula (grade B/C) was 15.7 %. Median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (2–63) days. Median follow-up was 16 months. Median survival was 31.3 months (95 % CI 22.9–39.6). Three- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 42.4 and 30 %, respectively. SLDP was associated with significantly higher survival compared with ELDP (p = 0.032).

Conclusions

LDP seems to be a feasible and safe procedure, providing satisfactory oncological outcomes in patients with PDAC.
0930-2794
3409-3418
Sahakyan, Mushegh A.
0ff80813-0da5-40f0-bfc6-0aa474d1bb75
Kazaryan, Airazat M.
7adf4cee-740f-4b4f-bf19-617c51b8b837
Rawashdeh, Majd
16176f99-a7b6-426b-8fe6-e1adb68d3726
Fuks, David
8136736e-aa17-490c-8d7f-86ccd7b25906
Shmavonyan, Mark
b4c9d138-a1b8-4639-96c9-2d505079fefb
Haugvik, Sven-Petter
4e172df6-e9c8-4d28-bb81-1268ffe5e808
Labori, Knut Jørgen
7f461246-32c5-4e4e-a7ee-53582e8706bc
Buanes, Trond
af6e5a26-e85e-4834-a8be-8da41383ccd5
Røsok, Bård Ingvald
6ac5bfc6-da12-4752-a0c7-10129507e12b
Ignjatovic, Dejan
cd0522ce-6990-417d-863b-3750d80f72d1
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Gayet, Brice
576fd706-862f-4204-89d9-80f52fa3afa6
Kim, Song Cheol
0c20933e-e502-4f8a-9885-5c6f6e90a94b
Edwin, Bjørn
b04994d3-928a-49ad-8bdf-183c7e7a08d2
Sahakyan, Mushegh A.
0ff80813-0da5-40f0-bfc6-0aa474d1bb75
Kazaryan, Airazat M.
7adf4cee-740f-4b4f-bf19-617c51b8b837
Rawashdeh, Majd
16176f99-a7b6-426b-8fe6-e1adb68d3726
Fuks, David
8136736e-aa17-490c-8d7f-86ccd7b25906
Shmavonyan, Mark
b4c9d138-a1b8-4639-96c9-2d505079fefb
Haugvik, Sven-Petter
4e172df6-e9c8-4d28-bb81-1268ffe5e808
Labori, Knut Jørgen
7f461246-32c5-4e4e-a7ee-53582e8706bc
Buanes, Trond
af6e5a26-e85e-4834-a8be-8da41383ccd5
Røsok, Bård Ingvald
6ac5bfc6-da12-4752-a0c7-10129507e12b
Ignjatovic, Dejan
cd0522ce-6990-417d-863b-3750d80f72d1
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Gayet, Brice
576fd706-862f-4204-89d9-80f52fa3afa6
Kim, Song Cheol
0c20933e-e502-4f8a-9885-5c6f6e90a94b
Edwin, Bjørn
b04994d3-928a-49ad-8bdf-183c7e7a08d2

Sahakyan, Mushegh A., Kazaryan, Airazat M., Rawashdeh, Majd, Fuks, David, Shmavonyan, Mark, Haugvik, Sven-Petter, Labori, Knut Jørgen, Buanes, Trond, Røsok, Bård Ingvald, Ignjatovic, Dejan, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Gayet, Brice, Kim, Song Cheol and Edwin, Bjørn (2016) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients. Surgical Endoscopy, 30 (8), 3409-3418. (doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4623-x). (PMID:26514135)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy is widely accepted as a feasible option for distal pancreatectomy. However, the experience in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is limited to a small number of studies, reported by expert centers. The present study aimed to evaluate perioperative and oncological outcomes after LDP for PDAC in a large, multicenter cohort of patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the data on 196 patients with histologically verified PDAC, operated at Oslo University Hospital—Rikshospitalet (Oslo, Norway), Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea), Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (Paris, France) and University Hospital Southampton (Southampton, UK) between January 2002 and April 2015 was conducted. The patients with standard (SLDP) and extended (i.e., en bloc with adjacent organ, ELDP) resections were compared in terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes.

Results

Out of 196 LDP procedures, 191 (97.4 %) were completed through laparoscopy, while five (2.6 %) were converted to open surgery. ELDP was performed in 30 (15.7 %) cases. Sixty-one (31.9 %) patients experienced postoperative complications, including 48 (25.1 %) with pancreatic fistula. The rate of clinically relevant fistula (grade B/C) was 15.7 %. Median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (2–63) days. Median follow-up was 16 months. Median survival was 31.3 months (95 % CI 22.9–39.6). Three- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 42.4 and 30 %, respectively. SLDP was associated with significantly higher survival compared with ELDP (p = 0.032).

Conclusions

LDP seems to be a feasible and safe procedure, providing satisfactory oncological outcomes in patients with PDAC.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 October 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 October 2015
Published date: August 2016
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400310
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400310
ISSN: 0930-2794
PURE UUID: eab68c9e-6cd5-4359-a89b-cdb408418a54

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2016 10:27
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mushegh A. Sahakyan
Author: Airazat M. Kazaryan
Author: Majd Rawashdeh
Author: David Fuks
Author: Mark Shmavonyan
Author: Sven-Petter Haugvik
Author: Knut Jørgen Labori
Author: Trond Buanes
Author: Bård Ingvald Røsok
Author: Dejan Ignjatovic
Author: Mohammad Abu Hilal
Author: Brice Gayet
Author: Song Cheol Kim
Author: Bjørn Edwin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×