The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency
Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency
Background

Surgical management of liver lesions has moved toward “parenchymal-sparing” strategies. Although open parenchymal-sparing liver resections are supported by encouraging results, the applicability of the laparoscopic approach for nonperipheral tumors is still questionable. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, safety, and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection for nonperipheral lesions with a description of the technique adopted in this setting.

Study Design

A prospectively collected single-center database of 517 laparoscopic liver resections was reviewed. Laparoscopic nonperipheral parenchymal-sparing liver resections (LapPSLRs), that is, entirely intraparenchymal limited resections performed on nonperipheral lesions, were selected. Intra- and perioperative outcomes were analyzed along with 3-year actuarial survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Results

The group comprised 49 LapPSLRs. Colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent diagnosis (n = 24 patients). Lesions were located in segments 8, 7, 4a, and 3 in 51%, 8.2%, 36.7%, and 4.1% of cases, respectively. Conversion occurred in 4 patients (8%). Intra- and postoperative short-term outcomes were calculated for the 24 isolated LapPSLR (not associated with any concurrent liver resection). Median operative time and blood loss were 215 minutes and 225 mL, respectively. Pringle maneuver was used in 75% of cases. Postoperative 90-day mortality was nil and morbidity rate was 12.5%. Median postoperative stay was 3 days. Median tumor-free margin was 4 mm and 100% R0 rate was achieved for all LapPSLRs with curative intent. Three-year overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival rates were 100%, 65.2%, and 69.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resections for nonperipheral liver lesions are feasible and can be performed safely without compromising perioperative and oncological outcomes.
265-272
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Shelat, Vishal G
6ec4730c-124b-4a29-8cd3-db472027b5ec
Rawashdeh, Majd
16176f99-a7b6-426b-8fe6-e1adb68d3726
Francone, Elisa
6451da27-c5fe-4efb-b0e6-7ea516333c3b
Aldrighetti, Luca
bab36581-c535-4f90-970d-0a982fe7a244
Takhar, Arjun
e2f77012-0993-42e6-af95-597a73b6ce45
Armstrong, Thomas
3b87df01-cd08-4048-91c4-7390c73a5960
Pearce, Neil W
bbd2fe84-c835-4c73-aa40-ba5fceefa690
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Shelat, Vishal G
6ec4730c-124b-4a29-8cd3-db472027b5ec
Rawashdeh, Majd
16176f99-a7b6-426b-8fe6-e1adb68d3726
Francone, Elisa
6451da27-c5fe-4efb-b0e6-7ea516333c3b
Aldrighetti, Luca
bab36581-c535-4f90-970d-0a982fe7a244
Takhar, Arjun
e2f77012-0993-42e6-af95-597a73b6ce45
Armstrong, Thomas
3b87df01-cd08-4048-91c4-7390c73a5960
Pearce, Neil W
bbd2fe84-c835-4c73-aa40-ba5fceefa690
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47

Cipriani, Federica, Shelat, Vishal G, Rawashdeh, Majd, Francone, Elisa, Aldrighetti, Luca, Takhar, Arjun, Armstrong, Thomas, Pearce, Neil W and Abu Hilal, Mohammad (2015) Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 221 (2), 265-272. (doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.029). (PMID:25899733)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Surgical management of liver lesions has moved toward “parenchymal-sparing” strategies. Although open parenchymal-sparing liver resections are supported by encouraging results, the applicability of the laparoscopic approach for nonperipheral tumors is still questionable. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, safety, and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection for nonperipheral lesions with a description of the technique adopted in this setting.

Study Design

A prospectively collected single-center database of 517 laparoscopic liver resections was reviewed. Laparoscopic nonperipheral parenchymal-sparing liver resections (LapPSLRs), that is, entirely intraparenchymal limited resections performed on nonperipheral lesions, were selected. Intra- and perioperative outcomes were analyzed along with 3-year actuarial survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Results

The group comprised 49 LapPSLRs. Colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent diagnosis (n = 24 patients). Lesions were located in segments 8, 7, 4a, and 3 in 51%, 8.2%, 36.7%, and 4.1% of cases, respectively. Conversion occurred in 4 patients (8%). Intra- and postoperative short-term outcomes were calculated for the 24 isolated LapPSLR (not associated with any concurrent liver resection). Median operative time and blood loss were 215 minutes and 225 mL, respectively. Pringle maneuver was used in 75% of cases. Postoperative 90-day mortality was nil and morbidity rate was 12.5%. Median postoperative stay was 3 days. Median tumor-free margin was 4 mm and 100% R0 rate was achieved for all LapPSLRs with curative intent. Three-year overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival rates were 100%, 65.2%, and 69.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resections for nonperipheral liver lesions are feasible and can be performed safely without compromising perioperative and oncological outcomes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 March 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 March 2015
Published date: August 2015
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400316
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400316
PURE UUID: 75905381-be02-4e5e-aaf6-4f716c2d4e41

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2016 11:03
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Federica Cipriani
Author: Vishal G Shelat
Author: Majd Rawashdeh
Author: Elisa Francone
Author: Luca Aldrighetti
Author: Arjun Takhar
Author: Thomas Armstrong
Author: Neil W Pearce
Author: Mohammad Abu Hilal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×