The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis

Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis
Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis
Background/objectives The adoption of laparoscopy for distal pancreatectomy has proven to substantially improve short-term outcomes. Stress response after major surgery can be further minimized within an enhanced recovery programme (ERP). However, data on the potential benefit of an ERP for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are still lacking. The aim was to assess the feasibility, safety and cost of ERP for patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods This is a case-control study from a Tertiary University Hospital. Sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were analyzed. Twenty-two patients were enrolled for the ERP and compared with previous consecutive 44 patients managed traditionally (1:2 ratio). Operative details, post-operative outcome and cost analysis were compared in the two groups. Results Patients enrolled in the ERP had similar intraoperative blood loss (median 165 ml vs. 200 ml; p = 0.176), operation time (225min vs. 210min; p = 0.633), time to remove naso-gastric tube (1 vs. 1 day; p = 0.081) but significantly shorter time to mobilization (median 1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.0001), start solid diet (2 vs. 3 days; p = 0004), and pass stools (3 vs. 5 days; p = 0.002) compared to the control group. Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERP group (3 vs. 6 days; p < 0.0001). No significant difference in readmission or complication rate was observed. Cost analysis was significantly in favor of the ERP group (p = 0.0004). Conclusions Implementation of ERP optimizes outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with significant earlier return to normal gut function, reduced length of stay and cost saving.
1424-3903
185-190
Richardson, John
b396f3bb-cb5f-42c6-a559-707a5a541d67
Di Fabio, Francesco
5318ae30-aac4-49ab-b11c-289ae2049cdf
Clarke, Hannah
fcec7849-1d6e-4b3b-a323-70e325c7a89d
Bajalan, Mohammed
0a2697cd-c19a-4242-bad2-3b69a90d0549
Davids, Joe
bc68d9af-a034-4b41-8a32-543252479aca
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Richardson, John
b396f3bb-cb5f-42c6-a559-707a5a541d67
Di Fabio, Francesco
5318ae30-aac4-49ab-b11c-289ae2049cdf
Clarke, Hannah
fcec7849-1d6e-4b3b-a323-70e325c7a89d
Bajalan, Mohammed
0a2697cd-c19a-4242-bad2-3b69a90d0549
Davids, Joe
bc68d9af-a034-4b41-8a32-543252479aca
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47

Richardson, John, Di Fabio, Francesco, Clarke, Hannah, Bajalan, Mohammed, Davids, Joe and Abu Hilal, Mohammed (2015) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis. Pancreatology, 15 (2), 185-190. (doi:10.1016/j.pan.2015.01.002). (PMID:25641674)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background/objectives The adoption of laparoscopy for distal pancreatectomy has proven to substantially improve short-term outcomes. Stress response after major surgery can be further minimized within an enhanced recovery programme (ERP). However, data on the potential benefit of an ERP for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are still lacking. The aim was to assess the feasibility, safety and cost of ERP for patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods This is a case-control study from a Tertiary University Hospital. Sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were analyzed. Twenty-two patients were enrolled for the ERP and compared with previous consecutive 44 patients managed traditionally (1:2 ratio). Operative details, post-operative outcome and cost analysis were compared in the two groups. Results Patients enrolled in the ERP had similar intraoperative blood loss (median 165 ml vs. 200 ml; p = 0.176), operation time (225min vs. 210min; p = 0.633), time to remove naso-gastric tube (1 vs. 1 day; p = 0.081) but significantly shorter time to mobilization (median 1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.0001), start solid diet (2 vs. 3 days; p = 0004), and pass stools (3 vs. 5 days; p = 0.002) compared to the control group. Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERP group (3 vs. 6 days; p < 0.0001). No significant difference in readmission or complication rate was observed. Cost analysis was significantly in favor of the ERP group (p = 0.0004). Conclusions Implementation of ERP optimizes outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with significant earlier return to normal gut function, reduced length of stay and cost saving.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 20 January 2015
Published date: March 2015
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400320
ISSN: 1424-3903
PURE UUID: 9d7e3a49-5f79-44c7-8aec-46579b09356c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2016 13:41
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: John Richardson
Author: Francesco Di Fabio
Author: Hannah Clarke
Author: Mohammed Bajalan
Author: Joe Davids
Author: Mohammed Abu Hilal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×