The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Does the routine availability of CT–Derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone? The FFRCT RIPCORD Study.

Does the routine availability of CT–Derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone? The FFRCT RIPCORD Study.
Does the routine availability of CT–Derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone? The FFRCT RIPCORD Study.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of adding computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) data to computed tomography angiographic (CTA) data alone for assessment of lesion severity and patient management in 200 patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Invasive and noninvasive tests used in the assessment of patients with angina all have disadvantages. The ideal screening test for patients presenting for the first time with chest pain would describe both coronary anatomy and the presence of ischemia and would be readily accessible, low cost, and noninvasive.

METHODS: Two hundred patients with stable chest pain underwent CTA for clinical reasons, and FFRCT was calculated. Three experienced interventional cardiologists assessed the CTA result for each patient and by consensus developed a management plan (optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or more information required). FFRCT data for each vessel were then revealed, and the interventional cardiologists made a second plan by consensus, using the same 4 options. The primary endpoint for the study was the difference between the 2 strategies.

RESULTS: Overall, after disclosure of FFRCT data there was a change in the allocated management category on the basis of CTA alone in 72 cases (36%). This difference is explained by a discordance between the CTA- and FFRCT-derived assessments of lesion severity. For example, FFRCT was >0.80 in 13 of 44 vessels (29.5%) graded as having a stenosis>90%. In contrast, FFRCT was #0.80 in 17 of 366 vessels (4.6%) graded as having stenosis #50%.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates proof of concept that the availability of FFRCT results has a substantial effect on the labeling of significant coronary artery disease and therefore on the management of patients compared to CTA alone. Further studies are needed to determine whether FFRCT has potential as a noninvasive diagnostic and management screening tool for patients with stable chest pain.
1936-878X
1-7
Curzen, Nicholas P.
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Nolan, James
1cdb1e12-958f-4b04-a730-242dd48591b1
Zaman, Azfar G.
dadf7e3e-f6b2-429b-8344-b84347f68da5
Norgaard, Bjarne
971b3e72-e939-42fe-9da4-f0a943b67335
Rajani, Ronak
d5ebf00d-fbdb-47a2-8f17-89b47fb78daf
Curzen, Nicholas P.
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Nolan, James
1cdb1e12-958f-4b04-a730-242dd48591b1
Zaman, Azfar G.
dadf7e3e-f6b2-429b-8344-b84347f68da5
Norgaard, Bjarne
971b3e72-e939-42fe-9da4-f0a943b67335
Rajani, Ronak
d5ebf00d-fbdb-47a2-8f17-89b47fb78daf

Curzen, Nicholas P., Nolan, James and Zaman, Azfar G. et al. (2016) Does the routine availability of CT–Derived FFR influence management of patients with stable chest pain compared to CT angiography alone? The FFRCT RIPCORD Study. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, 1-7. (doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.026). (PMID:27568119)

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the effect of adding computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) data to computed tomography angiographic (CTA) data alone for assessment of lesion severity and patient management in 200 patients with chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Invasive and noninvasive tests used in the assessment of patients with angina all have disadvantages. The ideal screening test for patients presenting for the first time with chest pain would describe both coronary anatomy and the presence of ischemia and would be readily accessible, low cost, and noninvasive.

METHODS: Two hundred patients with stable chest pain underwent CTA for clinical reasons, and FFRCT was calculated. Three experienced interventional cardiologists assessed the CTA result for each patient and by consensus developed a management plan (optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or more information required). FFRCT data for each vessel were then revealed, and the interventional cardiologists made a second plan by consensus, using the same 4 options. The primary endpoint for the study was the difference between the 2 strategies.

RESULTS: Overall, after disclosure of FFRCT data there was a change in the allocated management category on the basis of CTA alone in 72 cases (36%). This difference is explained by a discordance between the CTA- and FFRCT-derived assessments of lesion severity. For example, FFRCT was >0.80 in 13 of 44 vessels (29.5%) graded as having a stenosis>90%. In contrast, FFRCT was #0.80 in 17 of 366 vessels (4.6%) graded as having stenosis #50%.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates proof of concept that the availability of FFRCT results has a substantial effect on the labeling of significant coronary artery disease and therefore on the management of patients compared to CTA alone. Further studies are needed to determine whether FFRCT has potential as a noninvasive diagnostic and management screening tool for patients with stable chest pain.

Text
2016_Curzen_FULLTEXT_FFRCT_RIPCORD_IJACC_OnlineAug24.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 December 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 August 2016
Organisations: Centre for Human Development, Stem Cells and Regeneration, Institute of Developmental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400346
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400346
ISSN: 1936-878X
PURE UUID: c44960f7-7253-4b25-bc8f-f680fa3769ce
ORCID for Nicholas P. Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2016 15:28
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Nolan
Author: Azfar G. Zaman
Author: Bjarne Norgaard
Author: Ronak Rajani

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×