Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders' position alignments in the European Commission's open consultations
Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders' position alignments in the European Commission's open consultations
What explains interest groups’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations? The article argues that formal membership ties facilitate organisational coordination and the creation of lobbying coalitions among interest groups, which in turn affects their position alignments. This argument is supported by empirical evidence from five environmental consultations. Sharing a formal membership tie within an over-arching organisational structure has a stronger effect on position alignment than the fact of representing the same type of interest or having the same organisational form. Coordinated, coalition-based lobbying accounts to a significant extent for stakeholders’ position alignments in the EU open consultations. The ‘social’ embeddedness of lobbying has a direct effect on the advocacy strategies interest groups decide to employ during the early stages of EU policymaking
281-299
Bunea, Adriana
35890bfe-2932-48ee-aef8-4a393a42eed1
25 May 2015
Bunea, Adriana
35890bfe-2932-48ee-aef8-4a393a42eed1
Bunea, Adriana
(2015)
Sharing ties and preferences: Stakeholders' position alignments in the European Commission's open consultations.
European Union Politics, 16 (2), .
(doi:10.1177/1465116514558338).
Abstract
What explains interest groups’ position alignments in the European Commission’s open consultations? The article argues that formal membership ties facilitate organisational coordination and the creation of lobbying coalitions among interest groups, which in turn affects their position alignments. This argument is supported by empirical evidence from five environmental consultations. Sharing a formal membership tie within an over-arching organisational structure has a stronger effect on position alignment than the fact of representing the same type of interest or having the same organisational form. Coordinated, coalition-based lobbying accounts to a significant extent for stakeholders’ position alignments in the EU open consultations. The ‘social’ embeddedness of lobbying has a direct effect on the advocacy strategies interest groups decide to employ during the early stages of EU policymaking
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 25 May 2015
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 400378
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400378
ISSN: 1465-1165
PURE UUID: dccfe82d-8b7a-4d4a-b3c4-1e07ab48bf2d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Sep 2016 13:35
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Adriana Bunea
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics