Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic?
Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic?
In theory, there is no hierarchy of rights in the Equality Act 2010: equal weight is given to each protected characteristic. At least two, very different, critiques though have been made of this argument as it relates to religion or belief. One argument is that religious discrimination has unfairly been given a lower priority than other characteristics, particularly sexual orientation. The second is that religion is inherently different, partly because religions tend to set extensive, and possibly discriminatory, rules for behaviour. In order to keep religion or belief claims within a reasonable limit, religious discrimination claims must therefore be confined. The perceived danger of confining these claims though is that, because of the insistence that there is no hierarchy of rights, this will lead to reduced protection across all the protected characteristics since concepts which apply across the Equality Act will be reinterpreted in order to avoid unwanted results. As will be demonstrated though, both of these arguments are misconceived
Pearson, Megan
fc57169e-5c44-405a-9d80-806ade39c1f2
March 2016
Pearson, Megan
fc57169e-5c44-405a-9d80-806ade39c1f2
Pearson, Megan
(2016)
Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic?
International Journal of Discrimination and the Law.
(doi:10.1177/1358229115627518).
Abstract
In theory, there is no hierarchy of rights in the Equality Act 2010: equal weight is given to each protected characteristic. At least two, very different, critiques though have been made of this argument as it relates to religion or belief. One argument is that religious discrimination has unfairly been given a lower priority than other characteristics, particularly sexual orientation. The second is that religion is inherently different, partly because religions tend to set extensive, and possibly discriminatory, rules for behaviour. In order to keep religion or belief claims within a reasonable limit, religious discrimination claims must therefore be confined. The perceived danger of confining these claims though is that, because of the insistence that there is no hierarchy of rights, this will lead to reduced protection across all the protected characteristics since concepts which apply across the Equality Act will be reinterpreted in order to avoid unwanted results. As will be demonstrated though, both of these arguments are misconceived
Text
Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: December 2015
Published date: March 2016
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 400494
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400494
ISSN: 1358-2291
PURE UUID: 9fa998f5-c06a-45c5-a49a-745a6996c00f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2016 13:40
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics