The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic?

Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic?
Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic?
In theory, there is no hierarchy of rights in the Equality Act 2010: equal weight is given to each protected characteristic. At least two, very different, critiques though have been made of this argument as it relates to religion or belief. One argument is that religious discrimination has unfairly been given a lower priority than other characteristics, particularly sexual orientation. The second is that religion is inherently different, partly because religions tend to set extensive, and possibly discriminatory, rules for behaviour. In order to keep religion or belief claims within a reasonable limit, religious discrimination claims must therefore be confined. The perceived danger of confining these claims though is that, because of the insistence that there is no hierarchy of rights, this will lead to reduced protection across all the protected characteristics since concepts which apply across the Equality Act will be reinterpreted in order to avoid unwanted results. As will be demonstrated though, both of these arguments are misconceived
1358-2291
Pearson, Megan
fc57169e-5c44-405a-9d80-806ade39c1f2
Pearson, Megan
fc57169e-5c44-405a-9d80-806ade39c1f2

Pearson, Megan (2016) Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’: non-existent, appropriate or problematic? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law. (doi:10.1177/1358229115627518).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In theory, there is no hierarchy of rights in the Equality Act 2010: equal weight is given to each protected characteristic. At least two, very different, critiques though have been made of this argument as it relates to religion or belief. One argument is that religious discrimination has unfairly been given a lower priority than other characteristics, particularly sexual orientation. The second is that religion is inherently different, partly because religions tend to set extensive, and possibly discriminatory, rules for behaviour. In order to keep religion or belief claims within a reasonable limit, religious discrimination claims must therefore be confined. The perceived danger of confining these claims though is that, because of the insistence that there is no hierarchy of rights, this will lead to reduced protection across all the protected characteristics since concepts which apply across the Equality Act will be reinterpreted in order to avoid unwanted results. As will be demonstrated though, both of these arguments are misconceived

Text
Religious discrimination and the ‘hierarchy of rights’.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (172kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: December 2015
Published date: March 2016
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400494
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400494
ISSN: 1358-2291
PURE UUID: 9fa998f5-c06a-45c5-a49a-745a6996c00f
ORCID for Megan Pearson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5330-4812

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Sep 2016 13:40
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×