Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world
Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world
The concept of ‘the field’ is significant in ethnographic research as well as qualitative research methods more generally. However, how a field researcher enters the field is usually taken for granted after gaining access to the field. We suggest that entrance is a distinct phase of fieldwork that differs from negotiating access. Entrance is not a trivial event; rather, it is a rite of passage into a complex practice world and marks a critical field moment. Drawing on our ethnography and insights from hermeneutics and anthropology, we show that a practical understanding of the field represents a fusion of horizons where a fieldworker is thrown. The concept of thrownness highlights the fact that the fieldworkers' own historicity and prejudices affect their entrance into the field; hence, entrance into the field orientates an ethnographer in the field and influences the entire period of fieldwork that follows. Our theorizing is intended as a contribution towards advancing the discussion of qualitative research methods.
795-817
Chughtai, Hameed
e8600973-9db8-4649-be67-def5f2a83a72
Myers, Michael David
6ef59212-863e-4b09-9802-0afc1d64ac71
2017
Chughtai, Hameed
e8600973-9db8-4649-be67-def5f2a83a72
Myers, Michael David
6ef59212-863e-4b09-9802-0afc1d64ac71
Chughtai, Hameed and Myers, Michael David
(2017)
Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world.
Information Systems Journal, 27 (6), .
(doi:10.1111/isj.12124).
Abstract
The concept of ‘the field’ is significant in ethnographic research as well as qualitative research methods more generally. However, how a field researcher enters the field is usually taken for granted after gaining access to the field. We suggest that entrance is a distinct phase of fieldwork that differs from negotiating access. Entrance is not a trivial event; rather, it is a rite of passage into a complex practice world and marks a critical field moment. Drawing on our ethnography and insights from hermeneutics and anthropology, we show that a practical understanding of the field represents a fusion of horizons where a fieldworker is thrown. The concept of thrownness highlights the fact that the fieldworkers' own historicity and prejudices affect their entrance into the field; hence, entrance into the field orientates an ethnographer in the field and influences the entire period of fieldwork that follows. Our theorizing is intended as a contribution towards advancing the discussion of qualitative research methods.
Text
s1-ln24109136318922301-1939656818Hwf-1173199447IdV180884799324109136PDF_HI0001.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 4 August 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 September 2016
Published date: 2017
Organisations:
Centre of Excellence in Decision, Analytics & Risk Research
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 400810
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400810
ISSN: 1350-1917
PURE UUID: bd2f66e4-145c-43d3-9679-b5d5874023ae
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Sep 2016 15:14
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Hameed Chughtai
Author:
Michael David Myers
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics