The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A long-term experimental case study of the ecological effectiveness and cost effectiveness of invasive plant management in achieving conservation goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia

A long-term experimental case study of the ecological effectiveness and cost effectiveness of invasive plant management in achieving conservation goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia
A long-term experimental case study of the ecological effectiveness and cost effectiveness of invasive plant management in achieving conservation goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia
Invasive plant management is often justified in terms of conservation goals, yet progress is rarely assessed against these broader goals, instead focussing on short-term reductions of the invader as a measure of success. Key questions commonly remain unanswered including whether invader removal reverses invader impacts and whether management itself has negative ecosystem impacts. We addressed these knowledge gaps using a seven year experimental investigation of Bitou Bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata. Our case study took advantage of the realities of applied management interventions for Bitou Bush to assess whether it is a driver or passenger of environmental change, and quantified conservation benefits relative to management costs of different treatment regimes. Among treatments examined, spraying with herbicide followed by burning and subsequent re-spraying (spray-fire-spray) proved the most effective for reducing the number of individuals and cover of Bitou Bush. Other treatment regimes (e.g. fire followed by spraying, or two fires in succession) were less effective or even exacerbated Bitou Bush invasion. The spray-fire-spray regime did not increase susceptibility of treated areas to re-invasion by Bitou Bush or other exotic species. This regime significantly reduced plant species richness and cover, but these effects were short-lived. The spray-fire-spray regime was the most cost-effective approach to controlling a highly invasive species and facilitating restoration of native plant species richness to levels characteristic of uninvaded sites. We provide a decision tree to guide management, where recommended actions depend on the outcome of post-treatment monitoring and performance against objectives. Critical to success is avoiding partial treatments and treatment sequences that may exacerbate invasive species impacts. We also show the value of taking advantage of unplanned events, such as wildfires, to achieve management objectives at reduced cost.
1932-6203
1-23
Li, Bo
30acbe59-a3fe-47a8-9e6a-2dd279f38a7a
Lindenmayer, David B.
796dd04c-eb47-4184-a29e-76d74e430e04
Wood, Jeff
c4d464a8-4563-424c-b49b-950b600dcfc2
MacGregor, Christopher
49be4340-b9ea-4bbb-968d-e508c24b8baf
Buckley, Yvonne M.
3c773f90-cc7d-4db3-9a6a-1a3d79e000c3
Dexter, Nicholas
f058aa61-e4e6-49d6-900c-64eff2782a1b
Fortescue, Martin
94256849-a787-4b1e-8ecf-f92227292ecb
Hobbs, Richard J.
baa4f667-f8bf-487a-8214-c1ceeaa50415
Catford, Jane
c80a4529-b7cb-4d36-aba8-f38de01ce729
Li, Bo
30acbe59-a3fe-47a8-9e6a-2dd279f38a7a
Lindenmayer, David B.
796dd04c-eb47-4184-a29e-76d74e430e04
Wood, Jeff
c4d464a8-4563-424c-b49b-950b600dcfc2
MacGregor, Christopher
49be4340-b9ea-4bbb-968d-e508c24b8baf
Buckley, Yvonne M.
3c773f90-cc7d-4db3-9a6a-1a3d79e000c3
Dexter, Nicholas
f058aa61-e4e6-49d6-900c-64eff2782a1b
Fortescue, Martin
94256849-a787-4b1e-8ecf-f92227292ecb
Hobbs, Richard J.
baa4f667-f8bf-487a-8214-c1ceeaa50415
Catford, Jane
c80a4529-b7cb-4d36-aba8-f38de01ce729

Li, Bo, Lindenmayer, David B., Wood, Jeff, MacGregor, Christopher, Buckley, Yvonne M., Dexter, Nicholas, Fortescue, Martin, Hobbs, Richard J. and Catford, Jane (2015) A long-term experimental case study of the ecological effectiveness and cost effectiveness of invasive plant management in achieving conservation goals: Bitou Bush Control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia. PLoS ONE, 10 (6), 1-23. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128482).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Invasive plant management is often justified in terms of conservation goals, yet progress is rarely assessed against these broader goals, instead focussing on short-term reductions of the invader as a measure of success. Key questions commonly remain unanswered including whether invader removal reverses invader impacts and whether management itself has negative ecosystem impacts. We addressed these knowledge gaps using a seven year experimental investigation of Bitou Bush, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata. Our case study took advantage of the realities of applied management interventions for Bitou Bush to assess whether it is a driver or passenger of environmental change, and quantified conservation benefits relative to management costs of different treatment regimes. Among treatments examined, spraying with herbicide followed by burning and subsequent re-spraying (spray-fire-spray) proved the most effective for reducing the number of individuals and cover of Bitou Bush. Other treatment regimes (e.g. fire followed by spraying, or two fires in succession) were less effective or even exacerbated Bitou Bush invasion. The spray-fire-spray regime did not increase susceptibility of treated areas to re-invasion by Bitou Bush or other exotic species. This regime significantly reduced plant species richness and cover, but these effects were short-lived. The spray-fire-spray regime was the most cost-effective approach to controlling a highly invasive species and facilitating restoration of native plant species richness to levels characteristic of uninvaded sites. We provide a decision tree to guide management, where recommended actions depend on the outcome of post-treatment monitoring and performance against objectives. Critical to success is avoiding partial treatments and treatment sequences that may exacerbate invasive species impacts. We also show the value of taking advantage of unplanned events, such as wildfires, to achieve management objectives at reduced cost.

Other
asset_id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0128482.PDF - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (13MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 April 2015
Published date: 3 June 2015
Organisations: Environmental

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400871
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400871
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 4d7f1e14-f637-471f-b7d8-83ff671d7c81
ORCID for Jane Catford: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-5960

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Sep 2016 15:28
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bo Li
Author: David B. Lindenmayer
Author: Jeff Wood
Author: Christopher MacGregor
Author: Yvonne M. Buckley
Author: Nicholas Dexter
Author: Martin Fortescue
Author: Richard J. Hobbs
Author: Jane Catford ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×