The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Using family based designs to explore causal mechanisms in conduct disorder

Using family based designs to explore causal mechanisms in conduct disorder
Using family based designs to explore causal mechanisms in conduct disorder
Conduct Disorder (CD) is one of the most common mental disorders seen in children and adolescents, with conduct problems accounting for 30-40% of referrals to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). The majority of studies in this area have adopted case-control correlational designs, demonstrating associations rather than causal links between putative neuropsychological or neuroanatomical risk factors and CD. Family based designs allow us to move closer to inferring the causal role of such mediating risk factors in the developmentof CD, through common genetic and environmental originating factors. One method, which has not yet been applied to CD research, is to study the biological relatives of those with CD, who do not show the disorder themselves, but may still carry risk markers for the condition. Identifying shared neuropsychological or neuroanatomical deficits in both affected and unaffected relatives, would suggest shared genetic and environmental factors may mediate and increase the risk for developing CD.

We therefore adopted a family design to test for the co-segregation of CD and its putative neuropsychological and neuroanatomical risk factors. There were three research groups: adolescents with CD (n=45), unaffected relatives of people with CD (n=24) and typically developing controls with no family history of CD (n=43). The project used a range of techniques, such as semi-structured psychiatric interviews, questionnaire measures, neuropsychological tasks (emotion recognition, fear conditioning, risky decision-making and economic decision-making) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) methods, to test whether CD and its putative cognitive and neuroanatomical deficits co-segregate within families.

Clinical and personality characteristics that are thought to increase risk for CD, such as callous-unemotional traits, drug use and impulsivity, did not show a familial pattern but were only elevated in affected probands. The familial pattern of effects varied across neuropsychological domains. Unaffected relatives demonstrated similar impairments to CD probands (albeit to a lesser degree), in emotion recognition and fear conditioning, but there was no evidence of familial effectson decision-making, either under risk or in an economic exchange task. There was mixed evidence for co-segregation of CD and neuroanatomical changes, with CD probands showing reductions in grey matter volume in the cerebellum, inferior frontal gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and unaffected relatives showing trends towards reductions in these regions. Interestingly, CD probands showed reduced grey matter volume in the anterior insula compared to unaffected relatives.

The current study was the first to directly compare adolescents with CD, unaffected relatives of people with CD and healthy controls. The findings suggest that neuropsychological deficits in emotion recognition and fear conditioning may increase the individual’s risk for developing CD in a probabilistic way and may help to inform future longitudinal studies of the development of CD and interventions for this condition.
Sully, Kate
3fa3e554-2598-4ccc-8da2-e580759f6fd6
Sully, Kate
3fa3e554-2598-4ccc-8da2-e580759f6fd6
Fairchild, Graeme
f99bc911-978e-48c2-9754-c6460666a95f
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635

Sully, Kate (2015) Using family based designs to explore causal mechanisms in conduct disorder. University of Southampton, School of Psychology, Doctoral Thesis, 285pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Conduct Disorder (CD) is one of the most common mental disorders seen in children and adolescents, with conduct problems accounting for 30-40% of referrals to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). The majority of studies in this area have adopted case-control correlational designs, demonstrating associations rather than causal links between putative neuropsychological or neuroanatomical risk factors and CD. Family based designs allow us to move closer to inferring the causal role of such mediating risk factors in the developmentof CD, through common genetic and environmental originating factors. One method, which has not yet been applied to CD research, is to study the biological relatives of those with CD, who do not show the disorder themselves, but may still carry risk markers for the condition. Identifying shared neuropsychological or neuroanatomical deficits in both affected and unaffected relatives, would suggest shared genetic and environmental factors may mediate and increase the risk for developing CD.

We therefore adopted a family design to test for the co-segregation of CD and its putative neuropsychological and neuroanatomical risk factors. There were three research groups: adolescents with CD (n=45), unaffected relatives of people with CD (n=24) and typically developing controls with no family history of CD (n=43). The project used a range of techniques, such as semi-structured psychiatric interviews, questionnaire measures, neuropsychological tasks (emotion recognition, fear conditioning, risky decision-making and economic decision-making) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) methods, to test whether CD and its putative cognitive and neuroanatomical deficits co-segregate within families.

Clinical and personality characteristics that are thought to increase risk for CD, such as callous-unemotional traits, drug use and impulsivity, did not show a familial pattern but were only elevated in affected probands. The familial pattern of effects varied across neuropsychological domains. Unaffected relatives demonstrated similar impairments to CD probands (albeit to a lesser degree), in emotion recognition and fear conditioning, but there was no evidence of familial effectson decision-making, either under risk or in an economic exchange task. There was mixed evidence for co-segregation of CD and neuroanatomical changes, with CD probands showing reductions in grey matter volume in the cerebellum, inferior frontal gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and unaffected relatives showing trends towards reductions in these regions. Interestingly, CD probands showed reduced grey matter volume in the anterior insula compared to unaffected relatives.

The current study was the first to directly compare adolescents with CD, unaffected relatives of people with CD and healthy controls. The findings suggest that neuropsychological deficits in emotion recognition and fear conditioning may increase the individual’s risk for developing CD in a probabilistic way and may help to inform future longitudinal studies of the development of CD and interventions for this condition.

Text
Final Thesis_KSully 18.02.16.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: March 2015
Organisations: University of Southampton, Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400956
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400956
PURE UUID: a6bc874e-b454-4daf-9a66-4a9abc4a0fd4
ORCID for Graeme Fairchild: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-9938

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Oct 2016 15:50
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: Kate Sully
Thesis advisor: Graeme Fairchild ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Edmund Sonuga-Barke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×