The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A feasibility study to prevent falls in older people who are sight impaired: the VIP2UK randomised controlled trial

A feasibility study to prevent falls in older people who are sight impaired: the VIP2UK randomised controlled trial
A feasibility study to prevent falls in older people who are sight impaired: the VIP2UK randomised controlled trial
Background: published evaluations of successful interventions to prevent falls in people with sight impairment (SI) are limited. The aim of this feasibility study is to optimise the design and investigation of home safety (HS) and home exercise (HE) programmes to prevent falls in older people with SI.

Methods: a community-based feasibility study in north-west England comprising a three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) allocated participants to (1) a control group receiving usual care and social visits, (2) an experimental group receiving the HS programme and (3) an experimental group receiving the HS?+?HE programme. Participants were community-dwelling, aged 65 years and older and sight impaired. Primary outcome data on falls were collected continuously over 6 months. Secondary outcomes on physical activity (self-report and instrumented) and adherence were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months for HE and at 6 months for the HS programme. Costs for the HS and HS?+?HE groups were calculated from logs of time spent on home visits, telephone calls and travel. The research assistant and statistician were blinded to group allocation.

Results: altogether, 49 people were recruited over a 9-month period (randomised: 16 to control, 16 to HS, 17 to HS?+?HE). The interventions were implemented over 6 months by an occupational therapist at a cost per person (pounds sterling, 2011) of £249 (HS) and £674 (HS?+?HE). Eighty-eight percent (43/49) completed the trial and 6-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, 100 % reported partially or completely adhering to HS recommendations but evidence for adherence to HE was equivocal. Although self-reported physical activity increased, instrumented monitoring showed a decrease in walking activity. There were no statistically significant differences in falls between the groups; however, the study was not powered to detect a difference.

Conclusion: it is feasible and acceptable for an occupational therapist to deliver HS and HE falls prevention programmes to people with SI living independently in the community. Future studies could access Local Authority Registers of people with SI to improve recruitment rates. Further research is required to identify how to improve adherence to HE and to measure changes in physical activity before conducting a definitive RCT
1745-6215
1-14
Waterman, Heather
8909ec85-69dd-484f-a798-60510da9f3c7
Ballinger, Claire
1495742c-90aa-4074-920e-95e6cc3d5380
Brundle, Caroline
fc217169-6118-489f-a0dd-4b619e5f9bf5
Chastin, Sebastien
108a8637-d098-4329-a5f9-6bf6c1985744
Gage, Heather
19bfbcaf-5cec-4ca4-8830-53216e56a460
Harper, Robert
09fea0ab-e8ee-410c-9b6d-834bfd1532ec
Henson, David
003e0a7c-cc9e-454a-b501-a49dc64200b7
Laventure, Bob
de31562d-8e57-4e36-9210-4664857765f1
McEvoy, Lisa
1dfed6b1-a8c8-48dd-b1f0-7551d56df267
Pilling, Mark
57edcb27-d9e7-43fa-9053-ede198f86413
Olleveant, Nicky
5134bbfe-0235-480d-9249-d3af208e6f3a
Skelton, Dawn A
531ca71e-d164-4257-94d1-38c57d4887a4
Stanford, Penelope
73c16673-4a5a-4b9e-8ffe-bcb8905cd068
Todd, Chris
33002864-c97b-434b-8b3f-95431310b2d7
Waterman, Heather
8909ec85-69dd-484f-a798-60510da9f3c7
Ballinger, Claire
1495742c-90aa-4074-920e-95e6cc3d5380
Brundle, Caroline
fc217169-6118-489f-a0dd-4b619e5f9bf5
Chastin, Sebastien
108a8637-d098-4329-a5f9-6bf6c1985744
Gage, Heather
19bfbcaf-5cec-4ca4-8830-53216e56a460
Harper, Robert
09fea0ab-e8ee-410c-9b6d-834bfd1532ec
Henson, David
003e0a7c-cc9e-454a-b501-a49dc64200b7
Laventure, Bob
de31562d-8e57-4e36-9210-4664857765f1
McEvoy, Lisa
1dfed6b1-a8c8-48dd-b1f0-7551d56df267
Pilling, Mark
57edcb27-d9e7-43fa-9053-ede198f86413
Olleveant, Nicky
5134bbfe-0235-480d-9249-d3af208e6f3a
Skelton, Dawn A
531ca71e-d164-4257-94d1-38c57d4887a4
Stanford, Penelope
73c16673-4a5a-4b9e-8ffe-bcb8905cd068
Todd, Chris
33002864-c97b-434b-8b3f-95431310b2d7

Waterman, Heather, Ballinger, Claire, Brundle, Caroline, Chastin, Sebastien, Gage, Heather, Harper, Robert, Henson, David, Laventure, Bob, McEvoy, Lisa, Pilling, Mark, Olleveant, Nicky, Skelton, Dawn A, Stanford, Penelope and Todd, Chris (2016) A feasibility study to prevent falls in older people who are sight impaired: the VIP2UK randomised controlled trial. Trials, 17 (1), 1-14. (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1565-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: published evaluations of successful interventions to prevent falls in people with sight impairment (SI) are limited. The aim of this feasibility study is to optimise the design and investigation of home safety (HS) and home exercise (HE) programmes to prevent falls in older people with SI.

Methods: a community-based feasibility study in north-west England comprising a three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) allocated participants to (1) a control group receiving usual care and social visits, (2) an experimental group receiving the HS programme and (3) an experimental group receiving the HS?+?HE programme. Participants were community-dwelling, aged 65 years and older and sight impaired. Primary outcome data on falls were collected continuously over 6 months. Secondary outcomes on physical activity (self-report and instrumented) and adherence were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months for HE and at 6 months for the HS programme. Costs for the HS and HS?+?HE groups were calculated from logs of time spent on home visits, telephone calls and travel. The research assistant and statistician were blinded to group allocation.

Results: altogether, 49 people were recruited over a 9-month period (randomised: 16 to control, 16 to HS, 17 to HS?+?HE). The interventions were implemented over 6 months by an occupational therapist at a cost per person (pounds sterling, 2011) of £249 (HS) and £674 (HS?+?HE). Eighty-eight percent (43/49) completed the trial and 6-month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, 100 % reported partially or completely adhering to HS recommendations but evidence for adherence to HE was equivocal. Although self-reported physical activity increased, instrumented monitoring showed a decrease in walking activity. There were no statistically significant differences in falls between the groups; however, the study was not powered to detect a difference.

Conclusion: it is feasible and acceptable for an occupational therapist to deliver HS and HE falls prevention programmes to people with SI living independently in the community. Future studies could access Local Authority Registers of people with SI to improve recruitment rates. Further research is required to identify how to improve adherence to HE and to measure changes in physical activity before conducting a definitive RCT

Text
A feasibility study to prevent falls in older.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 August 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 September 2016
Published date: 26 September 2016
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 401189
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/401189
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 88866b9e-3bde-4096-8e1b-da39e550827a

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Oct 2016 09:15
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Heather Waterman
Author: Claire Ballinger
Author: Caroline Brundle
Author: Sebastien Chastin
Author: Heather Gage
Author: Robert Harper
Author: David Henson
Author: Bob Laventure
Author: Lisa McEvoy
Author: Mark Pilling
Author: Nicky Olleveant
Author: Dawn A Skelton
Author: Penelope Stanford
Author: Chris Todd

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×