Is there a "too big to fail" problem in the field?
Is there a "too big to fail" problem in the field?
 
  We use the Arecibo legacy fast ALFA (ALFALFA) 21 cm survey to measure the number density of galaxies as a function of their rotational velocity, Vrot,HI (as inferred from the width of their 21 cm emission line). Based on the measured velocity function we statistically connect galaxies with their host halo, via abundance matching. In a lambda cold dark matter (?CDM) cosmology, dwarf galaxies are expected to be hosted by halos that are significantly more massive than indicated by the measured galactic velocity; if smaller halos were allowed to host galaxies, then ALFALFA would measure a much higher galactic number density. We then seek observational verification of this predicted trend by analyzing the kinematics of a literature sample of gas-rich dwarf galaxies. We find that galaxies with Vrot,HI? 25 km s-1 are kinematically incompatible with their predicted ?CDM host halos, in the sense that hosts are too massive to be accommodated within the measured galactic rotation curves. This issue is analogous to the “too big to fail” problem faced by the bright satellites of the Milky Way, but here it concerns extreme dwarf galaxies in the field. Consequently, solutions based on satellite-specific processes are not applicable in this context. Our result confirms the findings of previous studies based on optical survey data and addresses a number of observational systematics present in these works. Furthermore, we point out the assumptions and uncertainties that could strongly affect our conclusions. We show that the two most important among them – namely baryonic effects on the abundances of halos and on the rotation curves of halos – do not seem capable of resolving the reported discrepancy.
  
  
  
    
      Papastergis, E.
      
        85052c63-65a0-4e33-9a28-2dbb2a019458
      
     
  
    
      Giovanelli, R.
      
        6212069a-1603-4b9e-a948-e3261bb19e40
      
     
  
    
      Haynes, M.P.
      
        fb551caa-41f3-4e8a-b453-4df435fccfe3
      
     
  
    
      Shankar, F.
      
        b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
    
      February 2015
    
    
  
  
    
      Papastergis, E.
      
        85052c63-65a0-4e33-9a28-2dbb2a019458
      
     
  
    
      Giovanelli, R.
      
        6212069a-1603-4b9e-a948-e3261bb19e40
      
     
  
    
      Haynes, M.P.
      
        fb551caa-41f3-4e8a-b453-4df435fccfe3
      
     
  
    
      Shankar, F.
      
        b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Papastergis, E., Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M.P. and Shankar, F.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2015)
  
  
    
    Is there a "too big to fail" problem in the field?
  
  
  
  
    Astronomy & Astrophysics, 574, [A113].
  
   (doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424909). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          We use the Arecibo legacy fast ALFA (ALFALFA) 21 cm survey to measure the number density of galaxies as a function of their rotational velocity, Vrot,HI (as inferred from the width of their 21 cm emission line). Based on the measured velocity function we statistically connect galaxies with their host halo, via abundance matching. In a lambda cold dark matter (?CDM) cosmology, dwarf galaxies are expected to be hosted by halos that are significantly more massive than indicated by the measured galactic velocity; if smaller halos were allowed to host galaxies, then ALFALFA would measure a much higher galactic number density. We then seek observational verification of this predicted trend by analyzing the kinematics of a literature sample of gas-rich dwarf galaxies. We find that galaxies with Vrot,HI? 25 km s-1 are kinematically incompatible with their predicted ?CDM host halos, in the sense that hosts are too massive to be accommodated within the measured galactic rotation curves. This issue is analogous to the “too big to fail” problem faced by the bright satellites of the Milky Way, but here it concerns extreme dwarf galaxies in the field. Consequently, solutions based on satellite-specific processes are not applicable in this context. Our result confirms the findings of previous studies based on optical survey data and addresses a number of observational systematics present in these works. Furthermore, we point out the assumptions and uncertainties that could strongly affect our conclusions. We show that the two most important among them – namely baryonic effects on the abundances of halos and on the rotation curves of halos – do not seem capable of resolving the reported discrepancy.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 __filestore.soton.ac.uk_users_fs1y12_mydesktop_1407.4665v3.pdf
     - Accepted Manuscript
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Accepted/In Press date: 20 November 2014
 
    
      e-pub ahead of print date: 4 February 2015
 
    
      Published date: February 2015
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Organisations:
        Astronomy Group
      
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 401223
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/401223
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 0004-6361
        
        
          PURE UUID: b0a0548c-0836-4297-be83-6e255f17bec2
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 10 Oct 2016 15:38
  Last modified: 21 Aug 2025 07:42
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              E. Papastergis
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              R. Giovanelli
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              M.P. Haynes
            
          
        
      
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics