Automaticity of smoking behaviour: the relationship between dual-task performance, daily cigarette intake, and subjective nicotine effects
Automaticity of smoking behaviour: the relationship between dual-task performance, daily cigarette intake, and subjective nicotine effects
Recent research using a dual-task procedure indicates that smoking behaviour can proceed automatically (i.e. it makes minimal demands on cognitive resources) in experienced, but not novice, smokers (Baxter and Hinson, 2001). The increased cognitive load of smoking behaviour in novice smokers was inferred from their slower response times (RTs) to auditory probes during smoking, relative to a baseline (no-smoking) condition. However, this effect of smoking behaviour on RTs may be confounded by the subjective effects of nicotine (e.g. 'head rush'), which may be greater in those who smoke less frequently. We employed the dual-task procedure to assess the relationships between (a) the effect of smoking on RTs to auditory probes, (b) the frequency of smoking behaviour (daily cigarette intake) and (c) the subjective effects of smoking. Results indicated that infrequent smokers showed an increased cognitive load (i.e. slower RTs to probes) during smoking, compared with frequent smokers, but there were no group differences in the subjective effects of smoking. Results suggest that smoking behaviour becomes automatized in those who smoke more frequently, and this is unconfounded by the subjective effects of nicotine.
smoking, automaticity, cognitive load, subjective effects, nicotine
799-805
Field, Matthew
01b27964-e376-4d2f-8169-ca0ffcdb8697
Mogg, Karin
5f1474af-85f5-4fd3-8eb6-0371be848e30
Bradley, Brendan P.
bdacaa6c-528b-4086-9448-27ebfe463514
2006
Field, Matthew
01b27964-e376-4d2f-8169-ca0ffcdb8697
Mogg, Karin
5f1474af-85f5-4fd3-8eb6-0371be848e30
Bradley, Brendan P.
bdacaa6c-528b-4086-9448-27ebfe463514
Field, Matthew, Mogg, Karin and Bradley, Brendan P.
(2006)
Automaticity of smoking behaviour: the relationship between dual-task performance, daily cigarette intake, and subjective nicotine effects.
Journal of Psychopharmacology, 20 (6), .
(doi:10.1177/0269881106063997).
Abstract
Recent research using a dual-task procedure indicates that smoking behaviour can proceed automatically (i.e. it makes minimal demands on cognitive resources) in experienced, but not novice, smokers (Baxter and Hinson, 2001). The increased cognitive load of smoking behaviour in novice smokers was inferred from their slower response times (RTs) to auditory probes during smoking, relative to a baseline (no-smoking) condition. However, this effect of smoking behaviour on RTs may be confounded by the subjective effects of nicotine (e.g. 'head rush'), which may be greater in those who smoke less frequently. We employed the dual-task procedure to assess the relationships between (a) the effect of smoking on RTs to auditory probes, (b) the frequency of smoking behaviour (daily cigarette intake) and (c) the subjective effects of smoking. Results indicated that infrequent smokers showed an increased cognitive load (i.e. slower RTs to probes) during smoking, compared with frequent smokers, but there were no group differences in the subjective effects of smoking. Results suggest that smoking behaviour becomes automatized in those who smoke more frequently, and this is unconfounded by the subjective effects of nicotine.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
smoking, automaticity, cognitive load, subjective effects, nicotine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 40132
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40132
ISSN: 0269-8811
PURE UUID: 553e243c-0460-4f90-8434-ee14f2ea7a71
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Matthew Field
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics