Cognitive impairment and decline in different MS-subtypes
Cognitive impairment and decline in different MS-subtypes
This paper presents results of two studies conducted to investigate cognition in different MS subtypes. First, the results of a study that has previously been published will be discussed. This was a cross-sectional study with 108 relapsing–remitting (RR), 71 secondary progressive (SP), 55 primary progressive (PP) MS patients, and 67 healthy controls [S.C.J. Huijbregts, N.F. Kalkers, L.M.J. de Sonneville, V. de Groot, I.E.W. Reuling, C.H. Polman, Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing–remitting, secondary and primary progressive MS. Neurology 63 (2004) 335–339]. The second study involved a follow-up assessment after 2 years and included 30 SPMS patients, 25 PPMS patients, and 33 controls. The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB-N) was used for all cognitive assessments. All patient groups demonstrated cognitive deficits compared to healthy controls. RRMS patients were less affected compared to patients with progressive MS subtypes on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). These differences were attenuated after control for physical disability level as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale. RRMS and SPMS patients were more severely impaired than PPMS patients on the 10/36 Spatial Recall Task and Word List Generation. Results of the follow-up study indicated that both progressive MS subtypes showed a lack of improvement compared to controls on the PASAT and the SDMT, but not on the other tasks of the BRB-N, indicating that performance on tasks requiring multiple abilities concurrently, i.e. visuo-spatial ability and processing speed (SDMT) or working memory and processing speed (PASAT), is most likely to decline across time.
multiple sclerosis, SPMS, PPMS, RRMS, cognition, working memory, information processing speed
187-194
Huijbregts, S.C.J.
1268dc4d-9c81-4452-9da6-82cdc9dd39f8
Kalkers, N.F.
303118e6-ab4b-492e-971e-54fde08801ce
De Sonneville, L.M.J.
38de127a-43ac-48f9-a0a5-95e5ad2baa5d
De Groot, V.
0412729c-4548-42f3-8c88-5f7f0588f505
Polman, C.H.
1b8a6da4-2a0a-4015-b31c-5ee45be8c8d8
2006
Huijbregts, S.C.J.
1268dc4d-9c81-4452-9da6-82cdc9dd39f8
Kalkers, N.F.
303118e6-ab4b-492e-971e-54fde08801ce
De Sonneville, L.M.J.
38de127a-43ac-48f9-a0a5-95e5ad2baa5d
De Groot, V.
0412729c-4548-42f3-8c88-5f7f0588f505
Polman, C.H.
1b8a6da4-2a0a-4015-b31c-5ee45be8c8d8
Huijbregts, S.C.J., Kalkers, N.F., De Sonneville, L.M.J., De Groot, V. and Polman, C.H.
(2006)
Cognitive impairment and decline in different MS-subtypes.
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 245 (1-2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.jns.2005.07.018).
Abstract
This paper presents results of two studies conducted to investigate cognition in different MS subtypes. First, the results of a study that has previously been published will be discussed. This was a cross-sectional study with 108 relapsing–remitting (RR), 71 secondary progressive (SP), 55 primary progressive (PP) MS patients, and 67 healthy controls [S.C.J. Huijbregts, N.F. Kalkers, L.M.J. de Sonneville, V. de Groot, I.E.W. Reuling, C.H. Polman, Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing–remitting, secondary and primary progressive MS. Neurology 63 (2004) 335–339]. The second study involved a follow-up assessment after 2 years and included 30 SPMS patients, 25 PPMS patients, and 33 controls. The Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB-N) was used for all cognitive assessments. All patient groups demonstrated cognitive deficits compared to healthy controls. RRMS patients were less affected compared to patients with progressive MS subtypes on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). These differences were attenuated after control for physical disability level as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale. RRMS and SPMS patients were more severely impaired than PPMS patients on the 10/36 Spatial Recall Task and Word List Generation. Results of the follow-up study indicated that both progressive MS subtypes showed a lack of improvement compared to controls on the PASAT and the SDMT, but not on the other tasks of the BRB-N, indicating that performance on tasks requiring multiple abilities concurrently, i.e. visuo-spatial ability and processing speed (SDMT) or working memory and processing speed (PASAT), is most likely to decline across time.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
multiple sclerosis, SPMS, PPMS, RRMS, cognition, working memory, information processing speed
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 40136
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40136
ISSN: 0022-510X
PURE UUID: 59c9e85d-e07f-41c0-9cde-ce4c4f67be98
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
S.C.J. Huijbregts
Author:
N.F. Kalkers
Author:
L.M.J. De Sonneville
Author:
V. De Groot
Author:
C.H. Polman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics