A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design
A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design
This article compares the effectiveness of five viscous damper placement techniques, two standard and three advanced, for reducing seismic performance objectives, including peak interstory drifts, absolute accelerations, and residual drifts. The techniques are evaluated statistically for two steel moment-resisting frames under varying seismic hazard levels, employing linear viscous dampers and nonlinear time history analyses. Usability of the methods is also assessed. All the placement methods meet the desired drift limit but advanced techniques achieve additional improvement in drift reduction and distribution. Performance differences between the advanced techniques are minor, making usability a significant selection factor amongst the methods.
540-560
Whittle, J.K.
050f9005-d49b-4e1a-b004-a5a7be05d5ea
Williams, M.S.
53f91f8c-86fb-4ecc-88fc-41ec4a8fb7ca
Karavasilis, T.L.
15850eb0-6af4-4b6e-bab4-d5bde281b769
Blakeborough, A.
353bfa69-5d86-448c-be49-971980d986cb
Whittle, J.K.
050f9005-d49b-4e1a-b004-a5a7be05d5ea
Williams, M.S.
53f91f8c-86fb-4ecc-88fc-41ec4a8fb7ca
Karavasilis, T.L.
15850eb0-6af4-4b6e-bab4-d5bde281b769
Blakeborough, A.
353bfa69-5d86-448c-be49-971980d986cb
Whittle, J.K., Williams, M.S., Karavasilis, T.L. and Blakeborough, A.
(2012)
A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design.
Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 16 (4), .
(doi:10.1080/13632469.2011.653864).
Abstract
This article compares the effectiveness of five viscous damper placement techniques, two standard and three advanced, for reducing seismic performance objectives, including peak interstory drifts, absolute accelerations, and residual drifts. The techniques are evaluated statistically for two steel moment-resisting frames under varying seismic hazard levels, employing linear viscous dampers and nonlinear time history analyses. Usability of the methods is also assessed. All the placement methods meet the desired drift limit but advanced techniques achieve additional improvement in drift reduction and distribution. Performance differences between the advanced techniques are minor, making usability a significant selection factor amongst the methods.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 24 December 2011
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 May 2012
Organisations:
Infrastructure Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 401615
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/401615
ISSN: 1363-2469
PURE UUID: 8f5fc6bd-e4c5-4034-84f8-141303cdf90a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Oct 2016 15:52
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J.K. Whittle
Author:
M.S. Williams
Author:
T.L. Karavasilis
Author:
A. Blakeborough
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics