The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Vigilance for threat: effects of anxiety and defensiveness.

Vigilance for threat: effects of anxiety and defensiveness.
Vigilance for threat: effects of anxiety and defensiveness.
Eysenck’s (1997) theory that attentional biases for threat vary as an interactive function of trait anxiety and defensiveness was tested using a visual probe task. Two stimulus exposure conditions were used to explore a secondary issue concerning attentional allocation over time. Results indicated that, among high trait anxious participants, only those with low levels of defensiveness showed vigilance for threatening faces presented for 500 ms. They also showed an attentional preference for neutral faces, relative to happy faces, irrespective of exposure condition. This pattern was reversed in high trait anxious participants with high levels of defensiveness, who showed an attentional bias towards happy faces (relative to neutral faces) under both exposure conditions. The findings are discussed in relation to their implications for (a) the significance of measures of defensiveness for the conceptualization of high trait anxious individuals, and (b) the status of anxiety-related biases at different stages of information processing.
anxiety, defensiveness, attentional bias, emotional faces
0191-8869
1879-1891
Ioannou, Michel C.
80b05bf1-727f-4ced-b0a1-2f39ca5a36dd
Mogg, Karin
5f1474af-85f5-4fd3-8eb6-0371be848e30
Bradley, Brendan P.
bdacaa6c-528b-4086-9448-27ebfe463514
Ioannou, Michel C.
80b05bf1-727f-4ced-b0a1-2f39ca5a36dd
Mogg, Karin
5f1474af-85f5-4fd3-8eb6-0371be848e30
Bradley, Brendan P.
bdacaa6c-528b-4086-9448-27ebfe463514

Ioannou, Michel C., Mogg, Karin and Bradley, Brendan P. (2004) Vigilance for threat: effects of anxiety and defensiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (8), 1879-1891. (doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.018).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Eysenck’s (1997) theory that attentional biases for threat vary as an interactive function of trait anxiety and defensiveness was tested using a visual probe task. Two stimulus exposure conditions were used to explore a secondary issue concerning attentional allocation over time. Results indicated that, among high trait anxious participants, only those with low levels of defensiveness showed vigilance for threatening faces presented for 500 ms. They also showed an attentional preference for neutral faces, relative to happy faces, irrespective of exposure condition. This pattern was reversed in high trait anxious participants with high levels of defensiveness, who showed an attentional bias towards happy faces (relative to neutral faces) under both exposure conditions. The findings are discussed in relation to their implications for (a) the significance of measures of defensiveness for the conceptualization of high trait anxious individuals, and (b) the status of anxiety-related biases at different stages of information processing.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: anxiety, defensiveness, attentional bias, emotional faces

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 40178
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40178
ISSN: 0191-8869
PURE UUID: 4e94e5d4-3db6-430e-a2e5-808e4adc4e78
ORCID for Brendan P. Bradley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2801-4271

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michel C. Ioannou
Author: Karin Mogg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×