Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: the search for mechanisms
Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: the search for mechanisms
Although self-enhancement is linked to psychological benefits, it is also associated with personal and interpersonal liabilities (e.g., excessive risk taking, social exclusion). Hence, structuring social situations that prompt people to keep their self-enhancing beliefs in check can confer personal and interpersonal advantages. The authors examined whether accountability can serve this purpose. Accountability was defined as the expectation to explain, justify, and defend one's self-evaluations (grades on an essay) to another person ("audience"). Experiment 1 showed that accountability curtails self- enhancement. Experiment 2 ruled out audience concreteness and status as explanations for this effect. Experiment 3 demonstrated that accountability-induced self-enhancement reduction is due to identifiability. Experiment 4 documented that identifiability decreases self-enhancement because of evaluation expectancy and an accompanying focus on one's weaknesses.
592-605
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Herbst, Kenneth C.
8b2c0794-7a06-4a71-a799-0a4849abe33c
Hardin, Deletha P.
433aaaa0-734d-4052-bf8b-54ae88414f2c
Dardis, Gregory J.
374d0b12-09f5-4216-a3ed-238eab671d86
2002
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Herbst, Kenneth C.
8b2c0794-7a06-4a71-a799-0a4849abe33c
Hardin, Deletha P.
433aaaa0-734d-4052-bf8b-54ae88414f2c
Dardis, Gregory J.
374d0b12-09f5-4216-a3ed-238eab671d86
Sedikides, Constantine, Herbst, Kenneth C., Hardin, Deletha P. and Dardis, Gregory J.
(2002)
Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: the search for mechanisms.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (3), .
(doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.592).
Abstract
Although self-enhancement is linked to psychological benefits, it is also associated with personal and interpersonal liabilities (e.g., excessive risk taking, social exclusion). Hence, structuring social situations that prompt people to keep their self-enhancing beliefs in check can confer personal and interpersonal advantages. The authors examined whether accountability can serve this purpose. Accountability was defined as the expectation to explain, justify, and defend one's self-evaluations (grades on an essay) to another person ("audience"). Experiment 1 showed that accountability curtails self- enhancement. Experiment 2 ruled out audience concreteness and status as explanations for this effect. Experiment 3 demonstrated that accountability-induced self-enhancement reduction is due to identifiability. Experiment 4 documented that identifiability decreases self-enhancement because of evaluation expectancy and an accompanying focus on one's weaknesses.
Text
00005205-200209000-00007.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2002
Additional Information:
Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 40186
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40186
ISSN: 0022-3514
PURE UUID: 7b5b8ef2-ca72-4801-846f-4b5718b4c073
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Jul 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Kenneth C. Herbst
Author:
Deletha P. Hardin
Author:
Gregory J. Dardis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics