The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Retrieval selectivity in the processing of self-referent information: testing the boundaries of self-protection.

Retrieval selectivity in the processing of self-referent information: testing the boundaries of self-protection.
Retrieval selectivity in the processing of self-referent information: testing the boundaries of self-protection.
The mnemic neglect model (formerly the inconsistency - negativity neglect model, Sedikides & Green, 2000) contends that people recall self-referent feedback more poorly than other-referent feedback when it carries negative implications for central self-aspects, because such feedback is perceived as threatening. We tested the prediction that participants manifest such mnemic neglect only when the central negative feedback is highly diagnostic of self-aspects (high in threat potential), not when it is low in diagnosticity (low in threat potential). Participants read negative and positive feedback behaviors that referred either to the self or another person and that were either high or low in diagnosticity. As predicted, mnemic neglect was evident only for central negative behaviors high in diagnosticity. This retrieval selectivity illustrates the strategic nature of self-protection.
1529-8868
69-80
Green, Jeffrey
bd38753d-70c3-4327-9893-090ffb2b15ea
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Green, Jeffrey
bd38753d-70c3-4327-9893-090ffb2b15ea
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2

Green, Jeffrey and Sedikides, Constantine (2004) Retrieval selectivity in the processing of self-referent information: testing the boundaries of self-protection. Self and Identity, 3 (1), 69-80.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The mnemic neglect model (formerly the inconsistency - negativity neglect model, Sedikides & Green, 2000) contends that people recall self-referent feedback more poorly than other-referent feedback when it carries negative implications for central self-aspects, because such feedback is perceived as threatening. We tested the prediction that participants manifest such mnemic neglect only when the central negative feedback is highly diagnostic of self-aspects (high in threat potential), not when it is low in diagnosticity (low in threat potential). Participants read negative and positive feedback behaviors that referred either to the self or another person and that were either high or low in diagnosticity. As predicted, mnemic neglect was evident only for central negative behaviors high in diagnosticity. This retrieval selectivity illustrates the strategic nature of self-protection.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 40229
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40229
ISSN: 1529-8868
PURE UUID: 2e7222cc-7b71-4b4c-9612-07c9eb7b6571
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2006
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 03:08

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jeffrey Green

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×