Before rights and responsibilities: an African ethos of citizenship.
Before rights and responsibilities: an African ethos of citizenship.
The concept of citizenship lies at the heart of many problems in contemporary Africa. The dichotomy between indigenes and settlers, the focus of this chapter, is one such difficulty. It has provoked some of the most violent conflicts in Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and very recently, Cote d’Ivoire. The chapter demonstrates how African jurisprudence – particularly with its emphasis on human ontology – can contribute to a concept of citizenship capable of responding to this and other problems. The chapter uses the indigene and settler dichotomy as a methodological device to question what citizenship means today, and also, whether it yields to a proper understanding of the kind of moral values fundamental to societal co-existence. Going much further than this, the chapter argues that situating citizenship in an African jurisprudential context can encourage the most fundamental moral values central to what it means to live an ethical life as a citizen. The implication is that, when African jurisprudence is applied to citizenship, it does not place citizens at a threshold above aliens, foreigner’s, legal or illegal immigrants. African jurisprudence specifically shows that our moral obligations to each other precede, as the title of the chapter suggests, citizenship rights and responsibilities.
153-172
Onazi, Oche
3a6ff118-0cfb-4985-b642-4cefe8bc3fac
2014
Onazi, Oche
3a6ff118-0cfb-4985-b642-4cefe8bc3fac
Onazi, Oche
(2014)
Before rights and responsibilities: an African ethos of citizenship.
In,
Onazi, Oche
(ed.)
African Legal Theory and Contemporary Problems: Critical Essays.
(Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 29)
Dordrecht, NL.
Springer Dordrecht, .
(doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7537-4_8).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The concept of citizenship lies at the heart of many problems in contemporary Africa. The dichotomy between indigenes and settlers, the focus of this chapter, is one such difficulty. It has provoked some of the most violent conflicts in Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and very recently, Cote d’Ivoire. The chapter demonstrates how African jurisprudence – particularly with its emphasis on human ontology – can contribute to a concept of citizenship capable of responding to this and other problems. The chapter uses the indigene and settler dichotomy as a methodological device to question what citizenship means today, and also, whether it yields to a proper understanding of the kind of moral values fundamental to societal co-existence. Going much further than this, the chapter argues that situating citizenship in an African jurisprudential context can encourage the most fundamental moral values central to what it means to live an ethical life as a citizen. The implication is that, when African jurisprudence is applied to citizenship, it does not place citizens at a threshold above aliens, foreigner’s, legal or illegal immigrants. African jurisprudence specifically shows that our moral obligations to each other precede, as the title of the chapter suggests, citizenship rights and responsibilities.
Text
b07796a0-53cf-4f1e-8ecc-d70d17781354
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 October 2013
Published date: 2014
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 402497
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/402497
ISSN: 1534-6781
PURE UUID: b07796a0-53cf-4f1e-8ecc-d70d17781354
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Nov 2016 14:04
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:19
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Oche Onazi
Editor:
Oche Onazi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics