Social welfare in one-sided matchings: random priority and beyond
Social welfare in one-sided matchings: random priority and beyond
We study the problem of approximate social welfare maximization (without money) in one-sided matching problems when agents have unrestricted cardinal preferences over a finite set of items. Random priority is a very well-known truthful-in-expectation mechanism for the problem. We prove that the approximation ratio of random priority is O(n -1/2) while no truthful-in-expectation mechanism can achieve an approximation ratio better than O(n -1/2), where n is the number of agents and items. Furthermore, we prove that the approximation ratio of all ordinal (not necessarily truthful-in-expectation) mechanisms is upper bounded by O(n -1/2), indicating that random priority is asymptotically the best truthful-in-expectation mechanism and the best ordinal mechanism for the problem.
1-12
Filos-Ratsikas, Aris
14e554b2-bc6b-4b2c-a84d-8650ad4bed14
Frederiksen, Soren Kristoffer Stiil
3e896a21-0be0-4102-895d-2370e32c28ae
Zhang, Jie
6bad4e75-40e0-4ea3-866d-58c8018b225a
2014
Filos-Ratsikas, Aris
14e554b2-bc6b-4b2c-a84d-8650ad4bed14
Frederiksen, Soren Kristoffer Stiil
3e896a21-0be0-4102-895d-2370e32c28ae
Zhang, Jie
6bad4e75-40e0-4ea3-866d-58c8018b225a
Filos-Ratsikas, Aris, Frederiksen, Soren Kristoffer Stiil and Zhang, Jie
(2014)
Social welfare in one-sided matchings: random priority and beyond.
Lavi, R
(ed.)
In Algorithmic Game Theory: SAGT 2014.
vol. 8768,
Springer.
.
(doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_1).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
We study the problem of approximate social welfare maximization (without money) in one-sided matching problems when agents have unrestricted cardinal preferences over a finite set of items. Random priority is a very well-known truthful-in-expectation mechanism for the problem. We prove that the approximation ratio of random priority is O(n -1/2) while no truthful-in-expectation mechanism can achieve an approximation ratio better than O(n -1/2), where n is the number of agents and items. Furthermore, we prove that the approximation ratio of all ordinal (not necessarily truthful-in-expectation) mechanisms is upper bounded by O(n -1/2), indicating that random priority is asymptotically the best truthful-in-expectation mechanism and the best ordinal mechanism for the problem.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 2014
Published date: 2014
Organisations:
Agents, Interactions & Complexity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 402584
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/402584
ISSN: 0302-9743
PURE UUID: 4a534793-493f-439d-912c-45c1266279a2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Nov 2016 09:50
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 20:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Aris Filos-Ratsikas
Author:
Soren Kristoffer Stiil Frederiksen
Author:
Jie Zhang
Editor:
R Lavi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics