Processing affective images in the absence of visual awareness
Processing affective images in the absence of visual awareness
Given capacity limits, the visual system must prioritize the processing of sensory inputs that are most critical to successful interactions with the environment. Neurocognitive theories suggest that humans have evolved mechanisms that operate without awareness that selectively prioritize threatening stimuli in subsequent allocation of processing resources and access to awareness. Evidence for this ‘standard hypothesis’comes from paradigms that dissociate visual input from awareness. This thesis combines a narrative review, a meta-analytic review and three empirical studies to examine the extent to which emotionally salient stimuli are prioritized in the absence of awareness.
A general introduction and review of the literature is provided in Chapter 1. The meta analysis of previous literature (Chapter 2) reveals that evidence for an unconscious processing bias for threat isundermined by insufficiently rigorous awareness measures and inadequate control of low-level confounds. Chapter 3 reveals that autonomic arousal and attentional orienting to visual threats are eliminated under conditions where observers are objectively unaware of stimuli. Chapter 4 reveals that prioritized processing of fearful faces is parsimoniously explained by effective contrast: the relationship betweentheir Fourier spectrum and the contrast sensitivity function. Importantly, this explanation does not require or involve unconscious processing mechanisms that are sensitive to threat. Chapter 5 reveals that prioritized processing of emotional face stimuli is restricted to conditions of awareness, and may be parsimoniously explained by simple low-level variability between emotional and neutral face stimuli.
Previous and present findings and analyses are considered together in the discussion (Chapter 6). It is concluded that evidence for emotion-sensitive visual processing that operates without awareness is weak and that uncritical acceptance of the standard hypothesis is premature.
Hedger, Nicholas
ad57df70-75e3-43f3-a56e-d7416e06f334
July 2016
Hedger, Nicholas
ad57df70-75e3-43f3-a56e-d7416e06f334
Adams, Wendy
25685aaa-fc54-4d25-8d65-f35f4c5ab688
Garner, Matthew
3221c5b3-b951-4fec-b456-ec449e4ce072
Graf, Erich
1a5123e2-8f05-4084-a6e6-837dcfc66209
Gray, Katie
ac1f9467-033b-4423-91a0-414f3e06a593
Hedger, Nicholas
(2016)
Processing affective images in the absence of visual awareness.
University of Southampton, School of Psychology, Doctoral Thesis, 232pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Given capacity limits, the visual system must prioritize the processing of sensory inputs that are most critical to successful interactions with the environment. Neurocognitive theories suggest that humans have evolved mechanisms that operate without awareness that selectively prioritize threatening stimuli in subsequent allocation of processing resources and access to awareness. Evidence for this ‘standard hypothesis’comes from paradigms that dissociate visual input from awareness. This thesis combines a narrative review, a meta-analytic review and three empirical studies to examine the extent to which emotionally salient stimuli are prioritized in the absence of awareness.
A general introduction and review of the literature is provided in Chapter 1. The meta analysis of previous literature (Chapter 2) reveals that evidence for an unconscious processing bias for threat isundermined by insufficiently rigorous awareness measures and inadequate control of low-level confounds. Chapter 3 reveals that autonomic arousal and attentional orienting to visual threats are eliminated under conditions where observers are objectively unaware of stimuli. Chapter 4 reveals that prioritized processing of fearful faces is parsimoniously explained by effective contrast: the relationship betweentheir Fourier spectrum and the contrast sensitivity function. Importantly, this explanation does not require or involve unconscious processing mechanisms that are sensitive to threat. Chapter 5 reveals that prioritized processing of emotional face stimuli is restricted to conditions of awareness, and may be parsimoniously explained by simple low-level variability between emotional and neutral face stimuli.
Previous and present findings and analyses are considered together in the discussion (Chapter 6). It is concluded that evidence for emotion-sensitive visual processing that operates without awareness is weak and that uncritical acceptance of the standard hypothesis is premature.
Text
Nicholas Hedger Final THESIS.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: July 2016
Organisations:
University of Southampton, Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 402691
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/402691
PURE UUID: f46404ed-2365-462b-9417-0fd24da64d21
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Dec 2016 10:06
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:39
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Nicholas Hedger
Thesis advisor:
Katie Gray
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics