The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Challenging the knowledge transfer orthodoxy: knowledge co-construction in technology enhanced learning for children with autism.

Challenging the knowledge transfer orthodoxy: knowledge co-construction in technology enhanced learning for children with autism.
Challenging the knowledge transfer orthodoxy: knowledge co-construction in technology enhanced learning for children with autism.
Experimental intervention studies constitute the current dominant research designs in the autism education field. Such designs are based on a ‘knowledge transfer’ model of evidence-based practice in which research is conducted by researchers, and is then ‘transferred’ to practitioners to enable them to implement evidence-based interventions. While these research designs contribute important knowledge, they lead to a gap between what the research evidence may prescribe and what happens in practice, with a concomitant disparity between the priorities of researchers and practitioners. This paper discusses findings from the ESRC funded ‘SHAPE’ project, which adopted a different model of evidence-based practice, focusing on knowledge co-construction. Pupils (N=8), teachers (N=10), a Speech and Language Therapist and a parent in three different school communities investigated creative ways in which children’s social communication skills could be enhanced through technology use. Through a participatory methodology, digital stories were used as a method to enable engagement with the practical realities of the classroom and empower practitioners to construct and share their own authentic narratives. Participants articulated precise knowledge about the learning opportunities afforded to them and their pupils through quality interactions that were mediated by the technologies, as evidenced through digital stories. The Shape project shows that it is feasible to develop methodologies that enable genuine knowledge co-construction with school practitioners, parents and pupils. Such co-construction could offer realistic opportunities for pedagogical emancipation and innovation in evidence-based practice as an alternative to the currently dominant and narrow model of knowledge transfer.
0141-1926
394-413
Guldberg, Karen
9f6c5550-254c-47be-9a21-4d088aad7881
Parsons, Sarah
5af3382f-cda3-489c-a336-9604f3c04d7d
Porayska-Pomsta, Kaska
dd251479-77e4-41ec-9521-84c8294b55d2
Keay-Bright, Wendy
9ffbb185-e682-4389-ac3a-c4fa7b48c211
Guldberg, Karen
9f6c5550-254c-47be-9a21-4d088aad7881
Parsons, Sarah
5af3382f-cda3-489c-a336-9604f3c04d7d
Porayska-Pomsta, Kaska
dd251479-77e4-41ec-9521-84c8294b55d2
Keay-Bright, Wendy
9ffbb185-e682-4389-ac3a-c4fa7b48c211

Guldberg, Karen, Parsons, Sarah, Porayska-Pomsta, Kaska and Keay-Bright, Wendy (2017) Challenging the knowledge transfer orthodoxy: knowledge co-construction in technology enhanced learning for children with autism. British Educational Research Journal, 43 (2), 394-413. (doi:10.1002/berj.3275).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Experimental intervention studies constitute the current dominant research designs in the autism education field. Such designs are based on a ‘knowledge transfer’ model of evidence-based practice in which research is conducted by researchers, and is then ‘transferred’ to practitioners to enable them to implement evidence-based interventions. While these research designs contribute important knowledge, they lead to a gap between what the research evidence may prescribe and what happens in practice, with a concomitant disparity between the priorities of researchers and practitioners. This paper discusses findings from the ESRC funded ‘SHAPE’ project, which adopted a different model of evidence-based practice, focusing on knowledge co-construction. Pupils (N=8), teachers (N=10), a Speech and Language Therapist and a parent in three different school communities investigated creative ways in which children’s social communication skills could be enhanced through technology use. Through a participatory methodology, digital stories were used as a method to enable engagement with the practical realities of the classroom and empower practitioners to construct and share their own authentic narratives. Participants articulated precise knowledge about the learning opportunities afforded to them and their pupils through quality interactions that were mediated by the technologies, as evidenced through digital stories. The Shape project shows that it is feasible to develop methodologies that enable genuine knowledge co-construction with school practitioners, parents and pupils. Such co-construction could offer realistic opportunities for pedagogical emancipation and innovation in evidence-based practice as an alternative to the currently dominant and narrow model of knowledge transfer.

Text
Guldberg et al KnowledgeTransferOrthodoxy BERJ Author accepted.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (681kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 November 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 April 2017
Published date: April 2017
Organisations: Centre for Research in Inclusion

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 402921
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/402921
ISSN: 0141-1926
PURE UUID: f67af705-16a8-436a-bbe6-ecd56ea97179
ORCID for Sarah Parsons: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2542-4745

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Nov 2016 14:46
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Karen Guldberg
Author: Sarah Parsons ORCID iD
Author: Kaska Porayska-Pomsta
Author: Wendy Keay-Bright

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×