Feasibility and added value of executive WalkRounds in long term care organizations in the Netherlands
Feasibility and added value of executive WalkRounds in long term care organizations in the Netherlands
Background: Currently available tools for the management of safety in health care are largely based on quantitative management information. Executive WalkRounds (WalkRounds [WR]) seems useful as a leadership tool to detect "soft signals"—alerts of unsafe situations or practices— and to enhance the mutual trust between frontline staff and the board of directors. The majority of the research on WR has been performed in hospitals. Therefore, a study was conducted to assess how the boards of directors of long term care organizations value WR as a leadership tool to perceive soft signals, and whether soft signals are of added value to enhance patient safety.
Methods: WRs were introduced in a convenience sample of six organizations—two mental health care institutions, two nursing homes and home care organizations, and two institutions for the physically and intellectually disabled— between July 2012 and December 2013. Data were gathered from observation and reporting forms. Feasibility was evaluated by open-group interviews. A mixed-method analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
Results: WRs were considered feasible, and the added value for the boards of directors consisted of an increased sense of urgency and safety awareness. The dialogue between the board of directors and frontline staff in each organization was essential for a collective patient safety culture. In total, WRs were used 68 times, and 298 soft signals were identified; most addressed care delivery and communication. Overall, 245 improvement activities were reported, of which 109 related to work environment.
Conclusion: WRs were considered useful and feasible for detecting soft signals in long term care organizations. These signals are valuable for enhancing patient safety and can be used by the board of directors in addition to the current quality management systems.
545-557
van Dusseldorp, Loes
1ffe8489-761c-4bf8-bd9c-4138cd433f85
Huisman - de Waal, Getty
eea23d85-6d47-41be-b364-d3cb0d4e774a
Hamers, Hub
b2134172-e87c-4ace-8aee-ed18314b80bf
Westert, Gert
d3a41e98-2219-41e9-b983-b70f7b517a62
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
December 2016
van Dusseldorp, Loes
1ffe8489-761c-4bf8-bd9c-4138cd433f85
Huisman - de Waal, Getty
eea23d85-6d47-41be-b364-d3cb0d4e774a
Hamers, Hub
b2134172-e87c-4ace-8aee-ed18314b80bf
Westert, Gert
d3a41e98-2219-41e9-b983-b70f7b517a62
Schoonhoven, Lisette
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
van Dusseldorp, Loes, Huisman - de Waal, Getty, Hamers, Hub, Westert, Gert and Schoonhoven, Lisette
(2016)
Feasibility and added value of executive WalkRounds in long term care organizations in the Netherlands.
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 42 (12), .
(doi:10.1016/S1553-7250(16)30106-4).
Abstract
Background: Currently available tools for the management of safety in health care are largely based on quantitative management information. Executive WalkRounds (WalkRounds [WR]) seems useful as a leadership tool to detect "soft signals"—alerts of unsafe situations or practices— and to enhance the mutual trust between frontline staff and the board of directors. The majority of the research on WR has been performed in hospitals. Therefore, a study was conducted to assess how the boards of directors of long term care organizations value WR as a leadership tool to perceive soft signals, and whether soft signals are of added value to enhance patient safety.
Methods: WRs were introduced in a convenience sample of six organizations—two mental health care institutions, two nursing homes and home care organizations, and two institutions for the physically and intellectually disabled— between July 2012 and December 2013. Data were gathered from observation and reporting forms. Feasibility was evaluated by open-group interviews. A mixed-method analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
Results: WRs were considered feasible, and the added value for the boards of directors consisted of an increased sense of urgency and safety awareness. The dialogue between the board of directors and frontline staff in each organization was essential for a collective patient safety culture. In total, WRs were used 68 times, and 298 soft signals were identified; most addressed care delivery and communication. Overall, 245 improvement activities were reported, of which 109 related to work environment.
Conclusion: WRs were considered useful and feasible for detecting soft signals in long term care organizations. These signals are valuable for enhancing patient safety and can be used by the board of directors in addition to the current quality management systems.
Text
Feasibility and added value of executive walkrounds.docx
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Feasibility and added value of executive WalkRounds.docx
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 23 June 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 December 2016
Published date: December 2016
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 402948
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/402948
ISSN: 1553-7250
PURE UUID: 6f17bcee-8f08-4803-80e0-e694ac0f8c8d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Nov 2016 09:51
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Loes van Dusseldorp
Author:
Getty Huisman - de Waal
Author:
Hub Hamers
Author:
Gert Westert
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics