Remembrance of remembrance past.
Remembrance of remembrance past.
Arnold and Lindsay (2002) found that individuals more often failed to remember they had previously recalled an item if that item had been cued in a qualitatively different way on two recall occasions: the “forgot-it-all-along” (FIA) effect. Experiment 1 was designed to determine if the FIA effect arises because participants incorrectly believe they have not been previously tested for an item, or because they incorrectly believe they have failed to recall the item when previously tested. Experiment 2 measured participants' confidence in their incorrect prior-recall judgements, and Experiment 3 tested participants' ability to “recover” their previous recollection when the prior-recall context was restored. Results indicated that participants usually believed they had not previously been cued for the items they failed to remember previously recalling; they were often confident in their incorrect judgements of prior non?remembering; and re-introducing the context of prior remembering sometimes enabled them to recapture their memories of previous recall.
533-549
Arnold, Michelle M.
201113ad-16ee-47e7-a526-e2171150d39d
Lindsay, D. Stephen
9c9a44b6-f958-4d24-a80e-881648357cd8
2005
Arnold, Michelle M.
201113ad-16ee-47e7-a526-e2171150d39d
Lindsay, D. Stephen
9c9a44b6-f958-4d24-a80e-881648357cd8
Abstract
Arnold and Lindsay (2002) found that individuals more often failed to remember they had previously recalled an item if that item had been cued in a qualitatively different way on two recall occasions: the “forgot-it-all-along” (FIA) effect. Experiment 1 was designed to determine if the FIA effect arises because participants incorrectly believe they have not been previously tested for an item, or because they incorrectly believe they have failed to recall the item when previously tested. Experiment 2 measured participants' confidence in their incorrect prior-recall judgements, and Experiment 3 tested participants' ability to “recover” their previous recollection when the prior-recall context was restored. Results indicated that participants usually believed they had not previously been cued for the items they failed to remember previously recalling; they were often confident in their incorrect judgements of prior non?remembering; and re-introducing the context of prior remembering sometimes enabled them to recapture their memories of previous recall.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 40309
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40309
ISSN: 0965-8211
PURE UUID: 495ea0f3-2cfe-4787-836f-767d26312ba3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Michelle M. Arnold
Author:
D. Stephen Lindsay
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics