The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions

Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions
Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions
Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ?V?V and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience.
0094-5765
10-17
Lidtke, Aleksander
665c1a9b-a70d-4d73-bf48-4a6093d856b7
Lewis, Hugh
e9048cd8-c188-49cb-8e2a-45f6b316336a
Armellin, Roberto
61950d5c-3dcf-45f5-b391-7e8c6ffb8e6f
Urrutxua, Hodei
ec73b9d7-654f-4db7-9ff3-68ad05543cfe
Lidtke, Aleksander
665c1a9b-a70d-4d73-bf48-4a6093d856b7
Lewis, Hugh
e9048cd8-c188-49cb-8e2a-45f6b316336a
Armellin, Roberto
61950d5c-3dcf-45f5-b391-7e8c6ffb8e6f
Urrutxua, Hodei
ec73b9d7-654f-4db7-9ff3-68ad05543cfe

Lidtke, Aleksander, Lewis, Hugh, Armellin, Roberto and Urrutxua, Hodei (2017) Considering the collision probability of Active Debris Removal missions. Acta Astronautica, 131, 10-17. (doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Active Debris Removal (ADR) methods are being developed due to a growing concern about the congestion on-orbit and sustainability of spaceflight. This study examined the probability of an on-orbit collision between an ADR target, whilst being de-orbited, and all the objects in the public catalogue published by the US Strategic Command. Such a collision could have significant effects because the target is likely to be located in a densely populated orbital regime and thus follow-on collisions could take place. Six impulsive and three low-thrust example ADR mission trajectories were screened for conjunctions. Extremely close conjunctions were found to result in as much as 99% of the total accumulated collision probability. The need to avoid those conjunctions is highlighted, which raises concerns about ADR methods that do not support collision avoidance. Shortening the removal missions, at an expense of more ?V?V and so cost, will also lower their collision probability by reducing the number of conjunctions that they will experience.

Text
1-s2.0-S0094576516305434-main.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
ADRCollisionRisk.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (705kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 November 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2016
Published date: February 2017
Organisations: Astronautics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 403228
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/403228
ISSN: 0094-5765
PURE UUID: ff961bd9-afe5-4aef-b1ed-6c0a2f26ac62
ORCID for Hugh Lewis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3946-8757

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Nov 2016 09:11
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×