The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is the Digit Triplet Test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?

Is the Digit Triplet Test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?
Is the Digit Triplet Test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment?
Objectives: To evaluate the validity of the Digit Triplet Test (DTT) in a simulated home environment for measuring speech recognition in adults with cochlear implants by comparing the result to clinic speech perception tests. To evaluate the acceptability of the DTT in adults using cochlear implants.

Methods: A prospective single-centre study with the following outcomes:
• Digit Triplet Test Speech Reception Threshold
• Clinic speech perception tests (BKB sentences in quiet and noise, CUNY sentences with lip-reading)
• A satisfaction questionnaire to assess patient perception of the Digit Triplet Test
Sixteen people using cochlear implants aged from 43 to 83 years took part.

Results:
• Eighty-eight percent of participants were able to be tested on the DTT; there were no floor or ceiling effects.
• DTT SRT was highly correlated with clinic BKB sentence scores in quiet and adaptive noise, and participants felt positive about using the DTT for home testing.

Conclusion: The majority of adults using cochlear implants in this study were able and willing to use the DTT to test their speech recognition in a simulated home environment. The DTT SRT was highly correlated with traditional clinic sentence scores, supporting its validity as a home test for hearing in adults using cochlear implants. Hearing testing in the clinic is still the gold standard of clinical care for people with cochlear implants, but a home test could provide a useful addition.
1467-0100
97-105
Cullington, Helen
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Aidi, Talat
d6eea95f-2575-4002-b51b-7a48cd35d0b4
Cullington, Helen
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Aidi, Talat
d6eea95f-2575-4002-b51b-7a48cd35d0b4

Cullington, Helen and Aidi, Talat (2017) Is the Digit Triplet Test an effective and acceptable way to assess speech recognition in adults using cochlear implants in a home environment? Cochlear Implants International, 18 (2), 97-105. (doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1273435).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the validity of the Digit Triplet Test (DTT) in a simulated home environment for measuring speech recognition in adults with cochlear implants by comparing the result to clinic speech perception tests. To evaluate the acceptability of the DTT in adults using cochlear implants.

Methods: A prospective single-centre study with the following outcomes:
• Digit Triplet Test Speech Reception Threshold
• Clinic speech perception tests (BKB sentences in quiet and noise, CUNY sentences with lip-reading)
• A satisfaction questionnaire to assess patient perception of the Digit Triplet Test
Sixteen people using cochlear implants aged from 43 to 83 years took part.

Results:
• Eighty-eight percent of participants were able to be tested on the DTT; there were no floor or ceiling effects.
• DTT SRT was highly correlated with clinic BKB sentence scores in quiet and adaptive noise, and participants felt positive about using the DTT for home testing.

Conclusion: The majority of adults using cochlear implants in this study were able and willing to use the DTT to test their speech recognition in a simulated home environment. The DTT SRT was highly correlated with traditional clinic sentence scores, supporting its validity as a home test for hearing in adults using cochlear implants. Hearing testing in the clinic is still the gold standard of clinical care for people with cochlear implants, but a home test could provide a useful addition.

Text
CII paper_manuscript clean.docx - Accepted Manuscript
Download (192kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 November 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 25 January 2017
Published date: 25 January 2017
Organisations: Human Sciences Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 403294
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/403294
ISSN: 1467-0100
PURE UUID: fd7b7d8d-c6dc-4b62-8265-d4bd5b5ce307
ORCID for Helen Cullington: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-2020

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Nov 2016 15:18
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Talat Aidi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×