The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is social psychological research really so negatively biased?

Record type: Article

Krueger & Funder (K&F) overstate the defects of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST), and with it the magnitude of negativity bias within social psychology. We argue that replication matters more than NHST, that the pitfalls of NHST are not always or necessarily realized, and that not all biases are harmless offshoots of adaptive mental abilities.

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Gregg, Aiden P. and Sedikides, Constantine (2004) Is social psychological research really so negatively biased? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, (3), pp. 340-341. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X04340082).

More information

Published date: 2004
Additional Information: Short communication

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 40340
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40340
ISSN: 0140-525X
PURE UUID: 08b0f152-0c79-4cf2-b156-3cf0f9e38d7b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 15:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×