Wind resource assessment in heterogeneous terrain
Wind resource assessment in heterogeneous terrain
High-resolution particle image velocimetry data obtained in rough-wall
boundary layer experiments are re-analysed to examine the influence of
surface roughness heterogeneities on wind resource. Two different types
of heterogeneities are examined: (i) surfaces with repeating roughness
units of the order of the boundary layer thickness (Placidi &
Ganapathisubramani. 2015 J. Fluid Mech. 782, 541–566. (doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.552))
and (ii) surfaces with streamwise-aligned elevated strips that mimic
adjacent hills and valleys (Vanderwel & Ganapathisubramani. 2015 J. Fluid Mech. 774, 1–12. (doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.228)).
For the first case, the data show that the power extraction potential
is highly dependent on the surface morphology with a variation of up to
20% in the available wind resource across the different surfaces
examined. A strong correlation is shown to exist between the frontal and
plan solidities of the rough surfaces and the equivalent wind speed,
and hence the wind resource potential. These differences are also found
in profiles of and (where U
is the streamwise velocity), which act as proxies for thrust and power
output. For the second case, the secondary flows that cause low- and
high-momentum pathways when the spacing between adjacent hills is beyond
a critical value result in significant variations in wind resource
availability. Contour maps of and
show a large difference in thrust and power potential (over 50%)
between hills and valleys (at a fixed vertical height). These variations
do not seem to be present when adjacent hills are close to each other
(i.e. when the spacing is much less than the boundary layer thickness).
The variance in thrust and power also appears to be significant in the
presence of secondary flows. Finally, there are substantial differences
in the dispersive and turbulent stresses across the terrain, which could
lead to variable fatigue life depending on the placement of the
turbines within such heterogeneous terrain. Overall, these results
indicate the importance of accounting for heterogeneous terrain when
siting individual turbines and wind farms.
Vanderwel, Christina
fbc030f0-1822-4c3f-8e90-87f3cd8372bb
Placidi, Marco
7e827e7a-66c3-4047-81d5-c025a0e3b0cb
Ganapathisubramani, Bharath
5e69099f-2f39-4fdd-8a85-3ac906827052
Vanderwel, Christina
fbc030f0-1822-4c3f-8e90-87f3cd8372bb
Placidi, Marco
7e827e7a-66c3-4047-81d5-c025a0e3b0cb
Ganapathisubramani, Bharath
5e69099f-2f39-4fdd-8a85-3ac906827052
Vanderwel, Christina, Placidi, Marco and Ganapathisubramani, Bharath
(2017)
Wind resource assessment in heterogeneous terrain.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
(doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0109).
Abstract
High-resolution particle image velocimetry data obtained in rough-wall
boundary layer experiments are re-analysed to examine the influence of
surface roughness heterogeneities on wind resource. Two different types
of heterogeneities are examined: (i) surfaces with repeating roughness
units of the order of the boundary layer thickness (Placidi &
Ganapathisubramani. 2015 J. Fluid Mech. 782, 541–566. (doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.552))
and (ii) surfaces with streamwise-aligned elevated strips that mimic
adjacent hills and valleys (Vanderwel & Ganapathisubramani. 2015 J. Fluid Mech. 774, 1–12. (doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.228)).
For the first case, the data show that the power extraction potential
is highly dependent on the surface morphology with a variation of up to
20% in the available wind resource across the different surfaces
examined. A strong correlation is shown to exist between the frontal and
plan solidities of the rough surfaces and the equivalent wind speed,
and hence the wind resource potential. These differences are also found
in profiles of and (where U
is the streamwise velocity), which act as proxies for thrust and power
output. For the second case, the secondary flows that cause low- and
high-momentum pathways when the spacing between adjacent hills is beyond
a critical value result in significant variations in wind resource
availability. Contour maps of and
show a large difference in thrust and power potential (over 50%)
between hills and valleys (at a fixed vertical height). These variations
do not seem to be present when adjacent hills are close to each other
(i.e. when the spacing is much less than the boundary layer thickness).
The variance in thrust and power also appears to be significant in the
presence of secondary flows. Finally, there are substantial differences
in the dispersive and turbulent stresses across the terrain, which could
lead to variable fatigue life depending on the placement of the
turbines within such heterogeneous terrain. Overall, these results
indicate the importance of accounting for heterogeneous terrain when
siting individual turbines and wind farms.
Text
Wind resource assessment in heterogenous terrain .pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 23 November 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 March 2017
Organisations:
Aerodynamics & Flight Mechanics Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 403401
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/403401
ISSN: 1364-503X
PURE UUID: 7b181720-cb35-4e15-b8fc-3602dde00bc2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Nov 2016 13:06
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Marco Placidi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics