Distinctiveness helps when matching static faces and voices.
Distinctiveness helps when matching static faces and voices.
Three experiments are reported which examined the capacity to match a voice with a static image of a face. When using a simultaneous same/different matching task, performance was significantly better than chance (Experiments 1 and 2). However, it did not appear to depend either on sex of speaker, sex of listener, stimulus distinctiveness, or self-reported strategies (Experiment 2). Concerns over floor effects as well as a significant response bias prompted a change of task, and when performance was examined through matching a voice to a face lineup, a more interesting pattern emerged. Again, performance was significantly better than chance, but in addition, it was demonstrably affected by the distinctiveness of the speaker’s voice. These results are considered in the context of theoretical discussions regarding face-voice integration, and in the context of more applied considerations regarding multimodal benefits in witness scenarios.
1-16
Stevenage, Sarah
493f8c57-9af9-4783-b189-e06b8e958460
Hamlin, Iain
4c76876e-1b18-4744-a7a6-a2b9ba270600
Ford, Becky
770e19bc-e303-4e8a-a624-de676cd69af2
Stevenage, Sarah
493f8c57-9af9-4783-b189-e06b8e958460
Hamlin, Iain
4c76876e-1b18-4744-a7a6-a2b9ba270600
Ford, Becky
770e19bc-e303-4e8a-a624-de676cd69af2
Stevenage, Sarah, Hamlin, Iain and Ford, Becky
(2016)
Distinctiveness helps when matching static faces and voices.
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, .
(doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1272605).
Abstract
Three experiments are reported which examined the capacity to match a voice with a static image of a face. When using a simultaneous same/different matching task, performance was significantly better than chance (Experiments 1 and 2). However, it did not appear to depend either on sex of speaker, sex of listener, stimulus distinctiveness, or self-reported strategies (Experiment 2). Concerns over floor effects as well as a significant response bias prompted a change of task, and when performance was examined through matching a voice to a face lineup, a more interesting pattern emerged. Again, performance was significantly better than chance, but in addition, it was demonstrably affected by the distinctiveness of the speaker’s voice. These results are considered in the context of theoretical discussions regarding face-voice integration, and in the context of more applied considerations regarding multimodal benefits in witness scenarios.
Text
A distinctiveness advantage in face-voice matching_AUTHOR ACCEPTED VERSION.docx
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 8 December 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 December 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 404061
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/404061
ISSN: 2044-5911
PURE UUID: bea1c1ca-acc2-4d4b-8ebf-5def201f15b8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2016 11:37
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Iain Hamlin
Author:
Becky Ford
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics