The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

High resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land use change to energy crops in the UK

High resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land use change to energy crops in the UK
High resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land use change to energy crops in the UK
We implemented a spatial application of a previously evaluated model of soil GHG emissions, ECOSSE, in the United Kingdom to examine the impacts to 2050 of land-use transitions from existing land use, rotational cropland, permanent grassland or woodland, to six bioenergy crops; three ‘first-generation’ energy crops: oilseed rape, wheat and sugar beet, and three ‘second-generation’ energy crops: Miscanthus, short rotation coppice willow (SRC) and short rotation forestry poplar (SRF). Conversion of rotational crops to Miscanthus, SRC and SRF and conversion of permanent grass to SRF show beneficial changes in soil GHG balance over a significant area. Conversion of permanent grass to Miscanthus, permanent grass to SRF and forest to SRF shows detrimental changes in soil GHG balance over a significant area. Conversion of permanent grass to wheat, oilseed rape, sugar beet and SRC and all conversions from forest show large detrimental changes in soil GHG balance over most of the United Kingdom, largely due to moving from uncultivated soil to regular cultivation. Differences in net GHG emissions between climate scenarios to 2050 were not significant. Overall, SRF offers the greatest beneficial impact on soil GHG balance. These results provide one criterion for selection of bioenergy crops and do not consider GHG emission increases/decreases resulting from displaced food production, bio-physical factors (e.g. the energy density of the crop) and socio-economic factors (e.g. expenditure on harvesting equipment). Given that the soil GHG balance is dominated by change in soil organic carbon (SOC) with the difference among Miscanthus, SRC and SRF largely determined by yield, a target for management of perennial energy crops is to achieve the best possible yield using the most appropriate energy crop and cultivar for the local situation.
1757-1693
1-18
Richards, Mark
45c31f09-ff14-4a0c-92a2-82d5efd37da4
Pogson, Mark
b12c3b25-6c9f-47cf-a624-eb2362e25810
Dondini, Marta
6dba9acc-6aaf-4130-b68d-8ab50e963fe6
Jones, Edward O.
42d895a1-78ab-4920-9a05-36ee253257b8
Hastings, Astley
6ce7681f-42ba-4778-9843-b47da761edb5
Henner, Dagmar N.
c3b0e437-77f2-4507-b856-ca291fa2907b
Tallis, Matthew J.
b63327fb-b4f3-47de-9cd0-9fd61cfb7041
Casella, Eric
3a60adce-ddba-4e72-97e2-5ca161f32954
Matthews, Robert W.
b95b08fb-44c4-4347-a059-908d9b9d80b2
Henshall, Paul A.
28c4b390-4a4a-47c2-b73d-ffb3a61285e4
Milner, Suzanne
a15abb03-301b-42c6-a2e8-e932828b83a6
Taylor, Gail
McNamara, Niall P.
53c076f1-b994-427d-8fb7-06d5d5c0630b
Smith, Jo U.
9fe6ac8c-9599-4ea0-a0ce-ca243ba5ba5e
Smith, Pete
a8a5c7c1-faf6-4b75-b125-ec8c73d104a2
Richards, Mark
45c31f09-ff14-4a0c-92a2-82d5efd37da4
Pogson, Mark
b12c3b25-6c9f-47cf-a624-eb2362e25810
Dondini, Marta
6dba9acc-6aaf-4130-b68d-8ab50e963fe6
Jones, Edward O.
42d895a1-78ab-4920-9a05-36ee253257b8
Hastings, Astley
6ce7681f-42ba-4778-9843-b47da761edb5
Henner, Dagmar N.
c3b0e437-77f2-4507-b856-ca291fa2907b
Tallis, Matthew J.
b63327fb-b4f3-47de-9cd0-9fd61cfb7041
Casella, Eric
3a60adce-ddba-4e72-97e2-5ca161f32954
Matthews, Robert W.
b95b08fb-44c4-4347-a059-908d9b9d80b2
Henshall, Paul A.
28c4b390-4a4a-47c2-b73d-ffb3a61285e4
Milner, Suzanne
a15abb03-301b-42c6-a2e8-e932828b83a6
Taylor, Gail
McNamara, Niall P.
53c076f1-b994-427d-8fb7-06d5d5c0630b
Smith, Jo U.
9fe6ac8c-9599-4ea0-a0ce-ca243ba5ba5e
Smith, Pete
a8a5c7c1-faf6-4b75-b125-ec8c73d104a2

Richards, Mark, Pogson, Mark, Dondini, Marta, Jones, Edward O., Hastings, Astley, Henner, Dagmar N., Tallis, Matthew J., Casella, Eric, Matthews, Robert W., Henshall, Paul A., Milner, Suzanne, Taylor, Gail, McNamara, Niall P., Smith, Jo U. and Smith, Pete (2016) High resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land use change to energy crops in the UK. GCB Bioenergy, 1-18. (doi:10.1111/gcbb.12360).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We implemented a spatial application of a previously evaluated model of soil GHG emissions, ECOSSE, in the United Kingdom to examine the impacts to 2050 of land-use transitions from existing land use, rotational cropland, permanent grassland or woodland, to six bioenergy crops; three ‘first-generation’ energy crops: oilseed rape, wheat and sugar beet, and three ‘second-generation’ energy crops: Miscanthus, short rotation coppice willow (SRC) and short rotation forestry poplar (SRF). Conversion of rotational crops to Miscanthus, SRC and SRF and conversion of permanent grass to SRF show beneficial changes in soil GHG balance over a significant area. Conversion of permanent grass to Miscanthus, permanent grass to SRF and forest to SRF shows detrimental changes in soil GHG balance over a significant area. Conversion of permanent grass to wheat, oilseed rape, sugar beet and SRC and all conversions from forest show large detrimental changes in soil GHG balance over most of the United Kingdom, largely due to moving from uncultivated soil to regular cultivation. Differences in net GHG emissions between climate scenarios to 2050 were not significant. Overall, SRF offers the greatest beneficial impact on soil GHG balance. These results provide one criterion for selection of bioenergy crops and do not consider GHG emission increases/decreases resulting from displaced food production, bio-physical factors (e.g. the energy density of the crop) and socio-economic factors (e.g. expenditure on harvesting equipment). Given that the soil GHG balance is dominated by change in soil organic carbon (SOC) with the difference among Miscanthus, SRC and SRF largely determined by yield, a target for management of perennial energy crops is to achieve the best possible yield using the most appropriate energy crop and cultivar for the local situation.

Text
Richards_et_al-2016-GCB_Bioenergy.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 March 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 April 2016
Organisations: Centre for Biological Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 404583
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/404583
ISSN: 1757-1693
PURE UUID: e28feacd-7996-4d68-8aaa-d96728caa661

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jan 2017 16:10
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mark Richards
Author: Mark Pogson
Author: Marta Dondini
Author: Edward O. Jones
Author: Astley Hastings
Author: Dagmar N. Henner
Author: Matthew J. Tallis
Author: Eric Casella
Author: Robert W. Matthews
Author: Paul A. Henshall
Author: Suzanne Milner
Author: Gail Taylor
Author: Niall P. McNamara
Author: Jo U. Smith
Author: Pete Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×