Isolation predicts compositional change after discrete disturbances in a global meta-study
Isolation predicts compositional change after discrete disturbances in a global meta-study
Globally, anthropogenic disturbances are occurring at unprecedented rates and over extensive spatial and temporal scales. Human activities also affect natural disturbances, prompting shifts in their timing and intensities. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand and predict the response of ecosystems to disturbance. In this study, we investigated whether there are general determinants of community response to disturbance across different community types, locations, and disturbance events. We compiled 14 case studies of community response to disturbance from four continents, twelve aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem types, and eight different types of disturbance. We used community compositional differences and species richness to indicate community response. We used mixed-effects modeling to test the relationship between each of these response metrics and four potential explanatory factors: regional species pool size, isolation, number of generations passed, and relative disturbance intensity. We found that compositional similarity was higher between pre- and post-disturbance communities when the disturbed community was connected to adjacent undisturbed habitat. The number of generations that had passed since the disturbance event was a significant, but weak, predictor of community compositional change; two communities were responsible for the observed relationship. We found no significant relationships between the factors we tested and changes in species richness. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to search for general drivers of community resilience from a diverse set of case studies. The strength of the relationship between compositional change and isolation suggests that it may be informative in resilience research and biodiversity management.
1-11
Shackelford, Nancy
29b017cf-8072-4e3d-a4c7-bac3260f9569
Starzomski, Brian M.
c2adcb13-2c6d-4f9a-b0b2-43439b54d1b7
Banning, Natasha C.
de3331ca-9775-4c6f-8a2e-605aa627101b
Battaglia, Loretta L.
e96e6fa8-0d9d-4a69-b070-734149549660
Becker, Alistair
a4020fe6-baee-43c5-a433-64035e8c6e64
Bellingham, Peter J.
6e7adb41-8e2e-44b4-af6f-822449cb7a2e
Bestelmeyer, Brandon
ce222117-36e4-45f6-bbdf-b3305b141d8e
Catford, Jane A.
c80a4529-b7cb-4d36-aba8-f38de01ce729
Dwyer, John M.
048e25d0-e7b2-4296-907d-3091aaecb602
Dynesius, Mats
67a0fd3d-3038-474e-be9a-4e2bf7483c8c
Gilmour, James
33158fc6-82a4-43cf-8606-a54b778a2b8d
Hallett, Lauren M.
f5132a52-0054-4029-96a6-a8afca6ccc76
Hobbs, Richard J.
baa4f667-f8bf-487a-8214-c1ceeaa50415
Price, Jodi
e8a6d1f3-08e5-4b25-9c94-bb7b1812aaea
Sasaki, Takehiro
169b6870-5294-458e-806a-c80925e7ec8c
Tanner, Edmund V.J.
deddb2dd-b63b-4cd5-95e6-604d211ab5b8
Standish, Rachel J.
c900e3c1-e482-4486-927d-476a71f26314
Shackelford, Nancy
29b017cf-8072-4e3d-a4c7-bac3260f9569
Starzomski, Brian M.
c2adcb13-2c6d-4f9a-b0b2-43439b54d1b7
Banning, Natasha C.
de3331ca-9775-4c6f-8a2e-605aa627101b
Battaglia, Loretta L.
e96e6fa8-0d9d-4a69-b070-734149549660
Becker, Alistair
a4020fe6-baee-43c5-a433-64035e8c6e64
Bellingham, Peter J.
6e7adb41-8e2e-44b4-af6f-822449cb7a2e
Bestelmeyer, Brandon
ce222117-36e4-45f6-bbdf-b3305b141d8e
Catford, Jane A.
c80a4529-b7cb-4d36-aba8-f38de01ce729
Dwyer, John M.
048e25d0-e7b2-4296-907d-3091aaecb602
Dynesius, Mats
67a0fd3d-3038-474e-be9a-4e2bf7483c8c
Gilmour, James
33158fc6-82a4-43cf-8606-a54b778a2b8d
Hallett, Lauren M.
f5132a52-0054-4029-96a6-a8afca6ccc76
Hobbs, Richard J.
baa4f667-f8bf-487a-8214-c1ceeaa50415
Price, Jodi
e8a6d1f3-08e5-4b25-9c94-bb7b1812aaea
Sasaki, Takehiro
169b6870-5294-458e-806a-c80925e7ec8c
Tanner, Edmund V.J.
deddb2dd-b63b-4cd5-95e6-604d211ab5b8
Standish, Rachel J.
c900e3c1-e482-4486-927d-476a71f26314
Shackelford, Nancy, Starzomski, Brian M., Banning, Natasha C., Battaglia, Loretta L., Becker, Alistair, Bellingham, Peter J., Bestelmeyer, Brandon, Catford, Jane A., Dwyer, John M., Dynesius, Mats, Gilmour, James, Hallett, Lauren M., Hobbs, Richard J., Price, Jodi, Sasaki, Takehiro, Tanner, Edmund V.J. and Standish, Rachel J.
(2017)
Isolation predicts compositional change after discrete disturbances in a global meta-study.
Ecography, .
(doi:10.1111/ecog.02383).
Abstract
Globally, anthropogenic disturbances are occurring at unprecedented rates and over extensive spatial and temporal scales. Human activities also affect natural disturbances, prompting shifts in their timing and intensities. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand and predict the response of ecosystems to disturbance. In this study, we investigated whether there are general determinants of community response to disturbance across different community types, locations, and disturbance events. We compiled 14 case studies of community response to disturbance from four continents, twelve aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem types, and eight different types of disturbance. We used community compositional differences and species richness to indicate community response. We used mixed-effects modeling to test the relationship between each of these response metrics and four potential explanatory factors: regional species pool size, isolation, number of generations passed, and relative disturbance intensity. We found that compositional similarity was higher between pre- and post-disturbance communities when the disturbed community was connected to adjacent undisturbed habitat. The number of generations that had passed since the disturbance event was a significant, but weak, predictor of community compositional change; two communities were responsible for the observed relationship. We found no significant relationships between the factors we tested and changes in species richness. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to search for general drivers of community resilience from a diverse set of case studies. The strength of the relationship between compositional change and isolation suggests that it may be informative in resilience research and biodiversity management.
Text
Shackelford_Community Recovery_ECOG[1].pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 17 October 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 January 2017
Organisations:
Environmental
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 404671
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/404671
ISSN: 0906-7590
PURE UUID: 3ff7c977-d084-46e6-996f-47a07b25b3b8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Jan 2017 15:17
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nancy Shackelford
Author:
Brian M. Starzomski
Author:
Natasha C. Banning
Author:
Loretta L. Battaglia
Author:
Alistair Becker
Author:
Peter J. Bellingham
Author:
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Author:
Jane A. Catford
Author:
John M. Dwyer
Author:
Mats Dynesius
Author:
James Gilmour
Author:
Lauren M. Hallett
Author:
Richard J. Hobbs
Author:
Jodi Price
Author:
Takehiro Sasaki
Author:
Edmund V.J. Tanner
Author:
Rachel J. Standish
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics