The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study

Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study
Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study
Purpose To establish the performance of screening with serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), interpreted using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA), and transvaginal sonography (TVS) for women at high risk of ovarian cancer (OC) or fallopian tube cancer (FTC). Patients and Methods Women whose estimated lifetime risk of OC/FTC was ≥ 10% were recruited at 42 centers in the United Kingdom and underwent ROCA screening every 4 months. TVS occurred annually if ROCA results were normal or within 2 months of an abnormal ROCA result. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) was encouraged throughout the study. Participants were observed via cancer registries, questionnaires, and notification by centers. Performance was calculated after censoring 365 days after prior screen, with modeling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. Results Between June 14, 2007, and May 15, 2012, 4,348 women underwent 13,728 women-years of screening. The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. Nineteen patients were diagnosed with invasive OC/FTC within 1 year of prior screening (13 diagnoses were screen-detected and six were occult at RRSO). No symptomatic interval cancers occurred. Ten (52.6%) of the total 19 diagnoses were stage I to II OC/FTC (CI, 28.9% to 75.6%). Of the 13 screen-detected cancers, five (38.5%) were stage I to II (CI, 13.9% to 68.4%). Of the six occult cancers, five (83.3%) were stage I to II (CI, 35.9% to 99.6%). Modeled sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for OC/FTC detection within 1 year were 94.7% (CI, 74.0% to 99.9%), 10.8% (6.5% to 16.5%), and 100% (CI, 100% to 100%), respectively. Seven (36.8%) of the 19 cancers diagnosed < 1 year after prior screen were stage IIIb to IV (CI, 16.3% to 61.6%) compared with 17 (94.4%) of 18 cancers diagnosed > 1 year after screening ended (CI, 72.7% to 99.9%; P < .001). Eighteen (94.8%) of 19 cancers diagnosed < 1 year after prior screen had zero residual disease (with lower surgical complexity, P = .16) (CI, 74.0% to 99.9%) compared with 13 (72.2%) of 18 cancers subsequently diagnosed (CI, 46.5% to 90.3%; P = .09). Conclusion ROCA-based screening is an option for women at high risk of OC/FTC who defer or decline RRSO, given its high sensitivity and significant stage shift. However, it remains unknown whether this strategy would improve survival in screened high-risk women.
1527-7755
1411-1422
Rosenthal, Adam
5d2313db-5b91-42d4-81f6-70a0cefdb851
Fraser, Lindsay
c2933103-cec3-4e09-ab33-121b4a51a6fb
Philpott, Susan
99983e33-ae01-4cd0-9b4a-36b6509e5a62
Manchanda, Ranjit
fcf99156-4522-406c-a935-f9885efb224c
Burnell, Matthew
54411b92-a8bc-4728-8959-a6667713cecd
Badman, Philip
3fd85f35-9612-447e-8193-3d4ff25c197b
Hadwin, Richard
046f8946-270c-4a32-8184-54ac13cb3e41
Rizzuto, Ivana
6fa84ff9-f4d3-43ab-9c89-8d823b0ce38b
Benjamin, Elizabeth
dcf412f7-34bc-4071-96dc-ecdea58e3db1
Singh, Navenna
ab8b9790-4af3-445a-a922-8e2f883bb142
Evans, D. Gareth
314acefb-89fb-4eb7-a0e7-0a6949c9af6c
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Ryan, Andy
401176ac-1f60-407d-ad20-2c8afe93e95a
Liston, Robert
03e276e0-399b-4edf-b8f0-39f6052afcab
Dawnay, Anne
4a7a92a9-4e20-415d-9b37-352abc325a7a
Ford, Jeremy
0d3119d4-50a4-45bf-a033-4ca5199bd698
Gunu, Richard
79f49882-9df0-4c41-a799-93364bb1a01c
Mackay, James
561a286b-9d0c-4f1c-aa7c-c64eceb02fb1
Skates, Steven J.
d5f583ab-5c46-496e-80e6-8645be40ad92
Menon, Usha
f0dd65de-11d4-489a-a468-9589bbe43969
Jacobs, Ian J.
5c66481b-e655-47ca-b40b-6e9d89728ca7
Rosenthal, Adam
5d2313db-5b91-42d4-81f6-70a0cefdb851
Fraser, Lindsay
c2933103-cec3-4e09-ab33-121b4a51a6fb
Philpott, Susan
99983e33-ae01-4cd0-9b4a-36b6509e5a62
Manchanda, Ranjit
fcf99156-4522-406c-a935-f9885efb224c
Burnell, Matthew
54411b92-a8bc-4728-8959-a6667713cecd
Badman, Philip
3fd85f35-9612-447e-8193-3d4ff25c197b
Hadwin, Richard
046f8946-270c-4a32-8184-54ac13cb3e41
Rizzuto, Ivana
6fa84ff9-f4d3-43ab-9c89-8d823b0ce38b
Benjamin, Elizabeth
dcf412f7-34bc-4071-96dc-ecdea58e3db1
Singh, Navenna
ab8b9790-4af3-445a-a922-8e2f883bb142
Evans, D. Gareth
314acefb-89fb-4eb7-a0e7-0a6949c9af6c
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Ryan, Andy
401176ac-1f60-407d-ad20-2c8afe93e95a
Liston, Robert
03e276e0-399b-4edf-b8f0-39f6052afcab
Dawnay, Anne
4a7a92a9-4e20-415d-9b37-352abc325a7a
Ford, Jeremy
0d3119d4-50a4-45bf-a033-4ca5199bd698
Gunu, Richard
79f49882-9df0-4c41-a799-93364bb1a01c
Mackay, James
561a286b-9d0c-4f1c-aa7c-c64eceb02fb1
Skates, Steven J.
d5f583ab-5c46-496e-80e6-8645be40ad92
Menon, Usha
f0dd65de-11d4-489a-a468-9589bbe43969
Jacobs, Ian J.
5c66481b-e655-47ca-b40b-6e9d89728ca7

Rosenthal, Adam, Fraser, Lindsay, Philpott, Susan, Manchanda, Ranjit, Burnell, Matthew, Badman, Philip, Hadwin, Richard, Rizzuto, Ivana, Benjamin, Elizabeth, Singh, Navenna, Evans, D. Gareth, Eccles, Diana, Ryan, Andy, Liston, Robert, Dawnay, Anne, Ford, Jeremy, Gunu, Richard, Mackay, James, Skates, Steven J., Menon, Usha and Jacobs, Ian J. (2017) Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35 (13), 1411-1422. (doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose To establish the performance of screening with serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), interpreted using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA), and transvaginal sonography (TVS) for women at high risk of ovarian cancer (OC) or fallopian tube cancer (FTC). Patients and Methods Women whose estimated lifetime risk of OC/FTC was ≥ 10% were recruited at 42 centers in the United Kingdom and underwent ROCA screening every 4 months. TVS occurred annually if ROCA results were normal or within 2 months of an abnormal ROCA result. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) was encouraged throughout the study. Participants were observed via cancer registries, questionnaires, and notification by centers. Performance was calculated after censoring 365 days after prior screen, with modeling of occult cancers detected at RRSO. Results Between June 14, 2007, and May 15, 2012, 4,348 women underwent 13,728 women-years of screening. The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. Nineteen patients were diagnosed with invasive OC/FTC within 1 year of prior screening (13 diagnoses were screen-detected and six were occult at RRSO). No symptomatic interval cancers occurred. Ten (52.6%) of the total 19 diagnoses were stage I to II OC/FTC (CI, 28.9% to 75.6%). Of the 13 screen-detected cancers, five (38.5%) were stage I to II (CI, 13.9% to 68.4%). Of the six occult cancers, five (83.3%) were stage I to II (CI, 35.9% to 99.6%). Modeled sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for OC/FTC detection within 1 year were 94.7% (CI, 74.0% to 99.9%), 10.8% (6.5% to 16.5%), and 100% (CI, 100% to 100%), respectively. Seven (36.8%) of the 19 cancers diagnosed < 1 year after prior screen were stage IIIb to IV (CI, 16.3% to 61.6%) compared with 17 (94.4%) of 18 cancers diagnosed > 1 year after screening ended (CI, 72.7% to 99.9%; P < .001). Eighteen (94.8%) of 19 cancers diagnosed < 1 year after prior screen had zero residual disease (with lower surgical complexity, P = .16) (CI, 74.0% to 99.9%) compared with 13 (72.2%) of 18 cancers subsequently diagnosed (CI, 46.5% to 90.3%; P = .09). Conclusion ROCA-based screening is an option for women at high risk of OC/FTC who defer or decline RRSO, given its high sensitivity and significant stage shift. However, it remains unknown whether this strategy would improve survival in screened high-risk women.

Text
RosenthalJCO2016accepted.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
jco.2016.69.9330 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (761kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 December 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 February 2017
Published date: 31 May 2017
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 405152
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405152
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: 33e200ca-cb46-4e02-8a8e-a28e1ee5939c
ORCID for Diana Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jan 2017 14:25
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adam Rosenthal
Author: Lindsay Fraser
Author: Susan Philpott
Author: Ranjit Manchanda
Author: Matthew Burnell
Author: Philip Badman
Author: Richard Hadwin
Author: Ivana Rizzuto
Author: Elizabeth Benjamin
Author: Navenna Singh
Author: D. Gareth Evans
Author: Diana Eccles ORCID iD
Author: Andy Ryan
Author: Robert Liston
Author: Anne Dawnay
Author: Jeremy Ford
Author: Richard Gunu
Author: James Mackay
Author: Steven J. Skates
Author: Usha Menon
Author: Ian J. Jacobs

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×