Seeing and retinal stability: on a sensorimotor argument for the necessity of eye movement for sight
Seeing and retinal stability: on a sensorimotor argument for the necessity of eye movement for sight
Sensorimotor theorists of perception have argued that eye movement is a necessary condition for seeing on the basis that subjects whose retinal images do not move undergo a form of blindness. I show that the argument does not work.
263-266
Cavedon-Taylor, Daniel
23ff735a-7f44-437f-9f42-d2002cf8de8a
2013
Cavedon-Taylor, Daniel
23ff735a-7f44-437f-9f42-d2002cf8de8a
Cavedon-Taylor, Daniel
(2013)
Seeing and retinal stability: on a sensorimotor argument for the necessity of eye movement for sight.
Philosophical Psychology, 26 (2), .
(doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.633699).
Abstract
Sensorimotor theorists of perception have argued that eye movement is a necessary condition for seeing on the basis that subjects whose retinal images do not move undergo a form of blindness. I show that the argument does not work.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: September 2011
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 November 2011
Published date: 2013
Organisations:
Philosophy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 405224
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405224
ISSN: 0951-5089
PURE UUID: 00eb4119-c413-49e8-af7f-869021ec0e3b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jan 2017 14:08
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:25
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniel Cavedon-Taylor
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics