Corporate compliance with non-mandatory statements of best practice: the case of the ASB Statement on interim reports
Corporate compliance with non-mandatory statements of best practice: the case of the ASB Statement on interim reports
This paper contributes to our understanding of compliance with non-mandatory statements of best practice. Specifically, we examine the efficacy of agency-related mechanisms on the degree of disclosure compliance with the ASB Statement on interim reports. Using data drawn from a sample of 259 UK companies listed on the London Stock Exchange, we show that although overall disclosure compliance is high (74.5% of the items of information being disclosed), companies do not fully comply with the ASB Statement on interim reports. We employ an ordinary least square (OLS) regression model to establish whether selected company-specific and corporate governance characteristics (proxying for agency-related mechanisms) are related to the degree of disclosure compliance. Our results indicate that multiple listing, company size, interim dividend and new share issuance are positively associated with the degree of compliance. We also find that the degree of disclosure compliance is positively associated with auditor involvement, audit committee independence and audit committee financial expertise. These results have important implications for policy because they suggest that whilst agency-related mechanisms may motivate compliance with best practice non-mandatory statements, full compliance may be unattainable without regulations
399-427
Mangena, Musa
c2c0772e-582d-47af-8bba-2cce06aa7a2f
Tauringana, Venancio
27634458-b041-4bc1-94da-3e031d777e4f
29 June 2007
Mangena, Musa
c2c0772e-582d-47af-8bba-2cce06aa7a2f
Tauringana, Venancio
27634458-b041-4bc1-94da-3e031d777e4f
Mangena, Musa and Tauringana, Venancio
(2007)
Corporate compliance with non-mandatory statements of best practice: the case of the ASB Statement on interim reports.
European Accounting Review, 16 (2), .
(doi:10.1080/09638180701391014).
Abstract
This paper contributes to our understanding of compliance with non-mandatory statements of best practice. Specifically, we examine the efficacy of agency-related mechanisms on the degree of disclosure compliance with the ASB Statement on interim reports. Using data drawn from a sample of 259 UK companies listed on the London Stock Exchange, we show that although overall disclosure compliance is high (74.5% of the items of information being disclosed), companies do not fully comply with the ASB Statement on interim reports. We employ an ordinary least square (OLS) regression model to establish whether selected company-specific and corporate governance characteristics (proxying for agency-related mechanisms) are related to the degree of disclosure compliance. Our results indicate that multiple listing, company size, interim dividend and new share issuance are positively associated with the degree of compliance. We also find that the degree of disclosure compliance is positively associated with auditor involvement, audit committee independence and audit committee financial expertise. These results have important implications for policy because they suggest that whilst agency-related mechanisms may motivate compliance with best practice non-mandatory statements, full compliance may be unattainable without regulations
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 29 June 2007
Organisations:
Centre of Excellence for International Banking, Finance & Accounting
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 405358
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405358
ISSN: 0963-8180
PURE UUID: 9028690e-3ef4-4c60-a164-af7b84d97e46
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Feb 2017 10:17
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Musa Mangena
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics