Neutrality of narrative discussion in annual reports of UK listed companies
Neutrality of narrative discussion in annual reports of UK listed companies
This paper reports the results of an investigation into the neutrality of the narrative discussion of financial performance and position, as evidenced in 179 annual reports of UK listed companies. Neutrality of narrative discussion was determined by comparing the average proportions of good and bad news contained in the narrative and statutory accounts sections of the annual reports. The results of a comparison of the proportion of good news in the two sections of the annual reports suggest that the narrative sections contained a significantly higher proportion of good news than the statutory accounts sections. Comparison of proportions of bad news, however, indicates that the narrative sections contained a significantly lower proportion of bad news compared to the statutory accounts sections. Finally, the results also suggest that the proportion of good news as compared to bad news in the narrative sections is significantly higher than the proportion of good news compared to bad news in the statutory accounts section. The results are consistent with the suggestion that company management highlights good news in narrative discussions. The implications of the findings for company management, users, auditors and regulators are discussed.
74-107
Tauringana, Venancio
27634458-b041-4bc1-94da-3e031d777e4f
Chong, Gin
cd3a87c8-a54e-4c7a-937a-1eca32766f14
2004
Tauringana, Venancio
27634458-b041-4bc1-94da-3e031d777e4f
Chong, Gin
cd3a87c8-a54e-4c7a-937a-1eca32766f14
Tauringana, Venancio and Chong, Gin
(2004)
Neutrality of narrative discussion in annual reports of UK listed companies.
International Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7 (1), .
(doi:10.1108/96754260480001035).
Abstract
This paper reports the results of an investigation into the neutrality of the narrative discussion of financial performance and position, as evidenced in 179 annual reports of UK listed companies. Neutrality of narrative discussion was determined by comparing the average proportions of good and bad news contained in the narrative and statutory accounts sections of the annual reports. The results of a comparison of the proportion of good news in the two sections of the annual reports suggest that the narrative sections contained a significantly higher proportion of good news than the statutory accounts sections. Comparison of proportions of bad news, however, indicates that the narrative sections contained a significantly lower proportion of bad news compared to the statutory accounts sections. Finally, the results also suggest that the proportion of good news as compared to bad news in the narrative sections is significantly higher than the proportion of good news compared to bad news in the statutory accounts section. The results are consistent with the suggestion that company management highlights good news in narrative discussions. The implications of the findings for company management, users, auditors and regulators are discussed.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Organisations:
Centre of Excellence for International Banking, Finance & Accounting
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 405362
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405362
ISSN: 0967-5426
PURE UUID: 6ebff2e2-4e12-47f8-aceb-9d3330fb8199
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Feb 2017 16:48
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gin Chong
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics