The importance of pro-social behaviour for the breadth and depth of knowledge transfer activities: an analysis of Italian academic scientists
The importance of pro-social behaviour for the breadth and depth of knowledge transfer activities: an analysis of Italian academic scientists
The debate on the entrepreneurial university has raised questions about what motivates academics to engage with the external environment and what forms knowledge transfer (KT) activities should take. This paper distinguishes between the variety of forms of engagement (KT breadth) and the intensity of collaboration (KT depth) in the analysis of their motivations. The paper relies on a sample of Italian academics from different scientific fields over the period 2004–2008. Whereas previous literature has shown that academics are essentially motivated by learning opportunities, fundraising and satisfaction derived from puzzle solving in research activities, our paper provides evidence of the positive role of an additional motivation for both the breadth and depth of KT: the extent to which the academic scientist advances the societal role of universities (“mission” motivation). We find that both “funding” and “mission” motivations have a positive effect on the variety and intensity of KT activities, with little effect for learning opportunities. Our results show also a higher effect of “funding” and “mission” on the depth of KT activities compared to their breadth.
497-509
Iorio, Roberto
0b68a1e4-248a-4831-a4ed-82d8d9f791c9
Labory, Sandrine
782d6f4e-75fc-46e7-acbf-aa6da28195fb
Rentocchini, Francesco
8ee609a8-8a3f-4a86-94be-5050f7d8c1cb
March 2017
Iorio, Roberto
0b68a1e4-248a-4831-a4ed-82d8d9f791c9
Labory, Sandrine
782d6f4e-75fc-46e7-acbf-aa6da28195fb
Rentocchini, Francesco
8ee609a8-8a3f-4a86-94be-5050f7d8c1cb
Iorio, Roberto, Labory, Sandrine and Rentocchini, Francesco
(2017)
The importance of pro-social behaviour for the breadth and depth of knowledge transfer activities: an analysis of Italian academic scientists.
Research Policy, 46 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.12.003).
Abstract
The debate on the entrepreneurial university has raised questions about what motivates academics to engage with the external environment and what forms knowledge transfer (KT) activities should take. This paper distinguishes between the variety of forms of engagement (KT breadth) and the intensity of collaboration (KT depth) in the analysis of their motivations. The paper relies on a sample of Italian academics from different scientific fields over the period 2004–2008. Whereas previous literature has shown that academics are essentially motivated by learning opportunities, fundraising and satisfaction derived from puzzle solving in research activities, our paper provides evidence of the positive role of an additional motivation for both the breadth and depth of KT: the extent to which the academic scientist advances the societal role of universities (“mission” motivation). We find that both “funding” and “mission” motivations have a positive effect on the variety and intensity of KT activities, with little effect for learning opportunities. Our results show also a higher effect of “funding” and “mission” on the depth of KT activities compared to their breadth.
Text
IorioEtAl2017.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 18 December 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 January 2017
Published date: March 2017
Organisations:
Southampton Business School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 405457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405457
ISSN: 0048-7333
PURE UUID: fe10d311-5265-45e8-b739-792c27212234
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Feb 2017 16:52
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Roberto Iorio
Author:
Sandrine Labory
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics