The high mass end of the stellar mass function: dependence on stellar population models and agreement between fits to the light profile
The high mass end of the stellar mass function: dependence on stellar population models and agreement between fits to the light profile
 
  We quantify the systematic effects on the stellar mass function that arise from assumptions about the stellar population, as well as how one fits the light profiles of the most luminous galaxies at z∼0.1. When comparing results from the literature, we are careful to separate out these effects. Our analysis shows that while systematics in the estimated comoving number density that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, systematics in photometry are now about 0.1 dex, in contrast to some recent claims in the literature. Compared to these more recent analyses, previous work based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey pipeline photometry leads to underestimates of ρ∗(≥M∗)by factors of 3–10 in the mass range 1011–1011.6 M⊙, but up to a factor of 100 at higher stellar masses. This impacts studies that match massive galaxies to dark matter haloes. Although systematics that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, our finding that systematics in photometry now amount to only about 0.1 dex in the stellar mass density is a significant improvement with respect to a decade ago. Our results highlight the importance of using the same stellar population and photometric models whenever low- and high-redshift samples are compared.
  
  
  2217-2233
  
    
      Bernardi, M.
      
        54b8a017-8b86-4c7d-87b3-a2ebda0b4e56
      
     
  
    
      Meert, A.
      
        c133df67-bace-473a-81fc-ec6347160df0
      
     
  
    
      Sheth, R. K.
      
        61385f53-bd4e-460c-8e8a-6ddf36e9e388
      
     
  
    
      Fischer, J.-L.
      
        5ff9941a-b4f9-46bc-a1f6-c87a9567587b
      
     
  
    
      Huertas-Company, M.
      
        270c4419-8043-47da-8665-252f16cf5ae7
      
     
  
    
      Maraston, C.
      
        1271ebd1-70e8-4a0a-8ce6-156a86f33424
      
     
  
    
      Shankar, F.
      
        b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
      
     
  
    
      Vikram, V.
      
        1082eeca-f2a4-429f-aeb1-ceaac1cc0235
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
    
  
    
    
  
    
      May 2017
    
    
  
  
    
      Bernardi, M.
      
        54b8a017-8b86-4c7d-87b3-a2ebda0b4e56
      
     
  
    
      Meert, A.
      
        c133df67-bace-473a-81fc-ec6347160df0
      
     
  
    
      Sheth, R. K.
      
        61385f53-bd4e-460c-8e8a-6ddf36e9e388
      
     
  
    
      Fischer, J.-L.
      
        5ff9941a-b4f9-46bc-a1f6-c87a9567587b
      
     
  
    
      Huertas-Company, M.
      
        270c4419-8043-47da-8665-252f16cf5ae7
      
     
  
    
      Maraston, C.
      
        1271ebd1-70e8-4a0a-8ce6-156a86f33424
      
     
  
    
      Shankar, F.
      
        b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
      
     
  
    
      Vikram, V.
      
        1082eeca-f2a4-429f-aeb1-ceaac1cc0235
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Bernardi, M., Meert, A., Sheth, R. K., Fischer, J.-L., Huertas-Company, M., Maraston, C., Shankar, F. and Vikram, V.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2017)
  
  
    
    The high mass end of the stellar mass function: dependence on stellar population models and agreement between fits to the light profile.
  
  
  
  
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 467 (2), .
  
   (doi:10.1093/mnras/stx176). 
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          We quantify the systematic effects on the stellar mass function that arise from assumptions about the stellar population, as well as how one fits the light profiles of the most luminous galaxies at z∼0.1. When comparing results from the literature, we are careful to separate out these effects. Our analysis shows that while systematics in the estimated comoving number density that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, systematics in photometry are now about 0.1 dex, in contrast to some recent claims in the literature. Compared to these more recent analyses, previous work based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey pipeline photometry leads to underestimates of ρ∗(≥M∗)by factors of 3–10 in the mass range 1011–1011.6 M⊙, but up to a factor of 100 at higher stellar masses. This impacts studies that match massive galaxies to dark matter haloes. Although systematics that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, our finding that systematics in photometry now amount to only about 0.1 dex in the stellar mass density is a significant improvement with respect to a decade ago. Our results highlight the importance of using the same stellar population and photometric models whenever low- and high-redshift samples are compared.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 __filestore.soton.ac.uk_users_fs1y12_mydesktop_1604.01036v1.pdf
     - Accepted Manuscript
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Accepted/In Press date: 19 January 2017
 
    
      e-pub ahead of print date: 23 January 2017
 
    
      Published date: May 2017
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Organisations:
        Astronomy Group
      
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 405466
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405466
        
          
        
        
        
          ISSN: 1365-2966
        
        
          PURE UUID: 793203dc-e4ab-4227-859c-380ec0800834
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 06 Feb 2017 10:12
  Last modified: 20 Aug 2025 23:38
  Export record
  
  
   Altmetrics
   
   
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              M. Bernardi
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              A. Meert
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              R. K. Sheth
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              J.-L. Fischer
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              M. Huertas-Company
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              C. Maraston
            
          
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              V. Vikram
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics