The high mass end of the stellar mass function: dependence on stellar population models and agreement between fits to the light profile
The high mass end of the stellar mass function: dependence on stellar population models and agreement between fits to the light profile
We quantify the systematic effects on the stellar mass function that arise from assumptions about the stellar population, as well as how one fits the light profiles of the most luminous galaxies at z∼0.1. When comparing results from the literature, we are careful to separate out these effects. Our analysis shows that while systematics in the estimated comoving number density that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, systematics in photometry are now about 0.1 dex, in contrast to some recent claims in the literature. Compared to these more recent analyses, previous work based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey pipeline photometry leads to underestimates of ρ∗(≥M∗)by factors of 3–10 in the mass range 1011–1011.6 M⊙, but up to a factor of 100 at higher stellar masses. This impacts studies that match massive galaxies to dark matter haloes. Although systematics that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, our finding that systematics in photometry now amount to only about 0.1 dex in the stellar mass density is a significant improvement with respect to a decade ago. Our results highlight the importance of using the same stellar population and photometric models whenever low- and high-redshift samples are compared.
2217-2233
Bernardi, M.
54b8a017-8b86-4c7d-87b3-a2ebda0b4e56
Meert, A.
c133df67-bace-473a-81fc-ec6347160df0
Sheth, R. K.
61385f53-bd4e-460c-8e8a-6ddf36e9e388
Fischer, J.-L.
5ff9941a-b4f9-46bc-a1f6-c87a9567587b
Huertas-Company, M.
270c4419-8043-47da-8665-252f16cf5ae7
Maraston, C.
1271ebd1-70e8-4a0a-8ce6-156a86f33424
Shankar, F.
b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
Vikram, V.
1082eeca-f2a4-429f-aeb1-ceaac1cc0235
May 2017
Bernardi, M.
54b8a017-8b86-4c7d-87b3-a2ebda0b4e56
Meert, A.
c133df67-bace-473a-81fc-ec6347160df0
Sheth, R. K.
61385f53-bd4e-460c-8e8a-6ddf36e9e388
Fischer, J.-L.
5ff9941a-b4f9-46bc-a1f6-c87a9567587b
Huertas-Company, M.
270c4419-8043-47da-8665-252f16cf5ae7
Maraston, C.
1271ebd1-70e8-4a0a-8ce6-156a86f33424
Shankar, F.
b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
Vikram, V.
1082eeca-f2a4-429f-aeb1-ceaac1cc0235
Bernardi, M., Meert, A., Sheth, R. K., Fischer, J.-L., Huertas-Company, M., Maraston, C., Shankar, F. and Vikram, V.
(2017)
The high mass end of the stellar mass function: dependence on stellar population models and agreement between fits to the light profile.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 467 (2), .
(doi:10.1093/mnras/stx176).
Abstract
We quantify the systematic effects on the stellar mass function that arise from assumptions about the stellar population, as well as how one fits the light profiles of the most luminous galaxies at z∼0.1. When comparing results from the literature, we are careful to separate out these effects. Our analysis shows that while systematics in the estimated comoving number density that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, systematics in photometry are now about 0.1 dex, in contrast to some recent claims in the literature. Compared to these more recent analyses, previous work based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey pipeline photometry leads to underestimates of ρ∗(≥M∗)by factors of 3–10 in the mass range 1011–1011.6 M⊙, but up to a factor of 100 at higher stellar masses. This impacts studies that match massive galaxies to dark matter haloes. Although systematics that arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of the order of ≤0.5 dex, our finding that systematics in photometry now amount to only about 0.1 dex in the stellar mass density is a significant improvement with respect to a decade ago. Our results highlight the importance of using the same stellar population and photometric models whenever low- and high-redshift samples are compared.
Text
__filestore.soton.ac.uk_users_fs1y12_mydesktop_1604.01036v1.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 January 2017
Published date: May 2017
Organisations:
Astronomy Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 405466
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405466
ISSN: 1365-2966
PURE UUID: 793203dc-e4ab-4227-859c-380ec0800834
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2017 10:12
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:30
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M. Bernardi
Author:
A. Meert
Author:
R. K. Sheth
Author:
J.-L. Fischer
Author:
M. Huertas-Company
Author:
C. Maraston
Author:
V. Vikram
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics