Audit committee characteristics and audit quality in a less regulated environment: evidence from audit pricing in aim
Audit committee characteristics and audit quality in a less regulated environment: evidence from audit pricing in aim
The Alternative Investment Market (AIM) was established in 1995 by the London Stock Exchange and, partly due to its more relaxed admission rules and reduced regulation, has established itself as an important part of the UK quoted company sector. Despite AIM’s growing importance relatively little academic attention has focused on AIM companies with a particular paucity of work in the context of auditing and financial reporting. This study seeks to address this gap by investigating the impact of a range of audit committee characteristics in relation to one proxy for audit quality – audit pricing. The absence of a corporate governance code for AIM companies means that, unlike their fully listed counterparts, there are no disclosure requirements relating to the existence and composition of audit committees. This then provides a fascinating opportunity to ascertain whether audit committee characteristics influence the quality of auditing undertaken in AIM firms. Specifically, following closely existing research in fully listed firms, we undertake an analysis of the impact of audit committee size, independence and expertise on the level of audit fees paid by 290 AIM firms who disclose detailed data on their audit committees. In summary, we find that the presence of an executive director on the audit committee has a significant and negative impact on audit fees while the presence of greater financial expertise has a positive impact. The link between reduced audit committee independence and lower audit fees is consistent with the notion that a lack of independence serves to reduce the extent of audit intensity, resulting in a lower quality audit. The positive impact of expertise on audit fees is consistent with greater expertise ensuring that audits are more comprehensive and resulting in a higher quality audit. Both of these findings are consistent with prevailing regulations relating to listed firms whereby greater audit committee independence and expertise are encouraged.
Xue, Bai
975f8125-7cf4-42b2-87fe-e5cb5a4da2e1
O'Sullivan, Noel
2b3991cb-0489-4110-8763-8e716a3fb702
Xue, Bai
975f8125-7cf4-42b2-87fe-e5cb5a4da2e1
O'Sullivan, Noel
2b3991cb-0489-4110-8763-8e716a3fb702
Xue, Bai and O'Sullivan, Noel
(2015)
Audit committee characteristics and audit quality in a less regulated environment: evidence from audit pricing in aim.
Athens Institute For Education And Research, 13th Annual International Conference on Accounting, , Athens, Greece.
25 - 28 May 2015.
1 pp
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
The Alternative Investment Market (AIM) was established in 1995 by the London Stock Exchange and, partly due to its more relaxed admission rules and reduced regulation, has established itself as an important part of the UK quoted company sector. Despite AIM’s growing importance relatively little academic attention has focused on AIM companies with a particular paucity of work in the context of auditing and financial reporting. This study seeks to address this gap by investigating the impact of a range of audit committee characteristics in relation to one proxy for audit quality – audit pricing. The absence of a corporate governance code for AIM companies means that, unlike their fully listed counterparts, there are no disclosure requirements relating to the existence and composition of audit committees. This then provides a fascinating opportunity to ascertain whether audit committee characteristics influence the quality of auditing undertaken in AIM firms. Specifically, following closely existing research in fully listed firms, we undertake an analysis of the impact of audit committee size, independence and expertise on the level of audit fees paid by 290 AIM firms who disclose detailed data on their audit committees. In summary, we find that the presence of an executive director on the audit committee has a significant and negative impact on audit fees while the presence of greater financial expertise has a positive impact. The link between reduced audit committee independence and lower audit fees is consistent with the notion that a lack of independence serves to reduce the extent of audit intensity, resulting in a lower quality audit. The positive impact of expertise on audit fees is consistent with greater expertise ensuring that audits are more comprehensive and resulting in a higher quality audit. Both of these findings are consistent with prevailing regulations relating to listed firms whereby greater audit committee independence and expertise are encouraged.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: May 2015
Venue - Dates:
Athens Institute For Education And Research, 13th Annual International Conference on Accounting, , Athens, Greece, 2015-05-25 - 2015-05-28
Organisations:
Southampton Business School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 405681
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405681
PURE UUID: 802fe41c-a052-48d6-ad8d-9d2b5bef9e6b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Feb 2017 14:56
Last modified: 20 Apr 2024 01:54
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Bai Xue
Author:
Noel O'Sullivan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics