The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measurement uncertainty associated with shipboard sample collection and filtration for the determination of the concentration of iron in seawater

Measurement uncertainty associated with shipboard sample collection and filtration for the determination of the concentration of iron in seawater
Measurement uncertainty associated with shipboard sample collection and filtration for the determination of the concentration of iron in seawater
A flow injection with chemiluminescence detection (FI-CL) method was used to determine the concentration of dissolved iron in seawater samples collected in the South Atlantic during the GEOTRACES GA10 cruise that took place from 24th December 2011–27th January 2012 on board the R.R.S. James Cook (cruise JC068). Six different sample collection and filtration strategies were used. Open ocean (shallow and deep) and coastal (shallow and deep) samples were collected and five sub-samples from each collection were filtered through a cartridge filter. For the deep open ocean sample, separate sub-samples were also filtered through a membrane disc filter. In addition, deep open ocean sub-samples were also taken from five separate sampling bottles. Each sub-sample (29 in total) was analysed six times (giving 174 discrete measurements in total) and the within sub-sample precision was in the range 1.4–12.2%. There was no statistically significant difference for the deep, open ocean sample between the mean results obtained with the two different filter types or the single sample bottle versus separate sample bottle sub-samples. Application of classical ANOVA showed that the relative combined standard uncertainty for each of the six sampling strategies ranged from 2.3–3.8%. This approach did not include an estimation of sampling bias. Application of robust ANOVA to the deep open ocean samples showed that contributions to the total variance were 0% from the different sample collection and filtration strategies, 42% from the sub-sample precision and 58% from between sub-sample measurements.
1759-9660
6711-6719
Clough, Robert
3cd2d6d7-3b64-4192-b021-a71441e6222a
Floor, Geerke H.
4b3e2643-a4ad-48f2-bcb0-cdcd7e70ee47
Quétel, Christophe R.
2bccf3ae-93d7-4a58-9126-27b51555f824
Milne, Angela
39b44fbd-8f5e-40ea-80c9-244c20998020
Lohan, Maeve C.
6ca10597-2d0f-40e8-8e4f-7619dfac5088
Worsfold, Paul J.
27675f89-7eee-45c5-821e-a381d8db9693
Clough, Robert
3cd2d6d7-3b64-4192-b021-a71441e6222a
Floor, Geerke H.
4b3e2643-a4ad-48f2-bcb0-cdcd7e70ee47
Quétel, Christophe R.
2bccf3ae-93d7-4a58-9126-27b51555f824
Milne, Angela
39b44fbd-8f5e-40ea-80c9-244c20998020
Lohan, Maeve C.
6ca10597-2d0f-40e8-8e4f-7619dfac5088
Worsfold, Paul J.
27675f89-7eee-45c5-821e-a381d8db9693

Clough, Robert, Floor, Geerke H., Quétel, Christophe R., Milne, Angela, Lohan, Maeve C. and Worsfold, Paul J. (2016) Measurement uncertainty associated with shipboard sample collection and filtration for the determination of the concentration of iron in seawater. Analytical Methods, 8 (37), 6711-6719. (doi:10.1039/C6AY01551D).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A flow injection with chemiluminescence detection (FI-CL) method was used to determine the concentration of dissolved iron in seawater samples collected in the South Atlantic during the GEOTRACES GA10 cruise that took place from 24th December 2011–27th January 2012 on board the R.R.S. James Cook (cruise JC068). Six different sample collection and filtration strategies were used. Open ocean (shallow and deep) and coastal (shallow and deep) samples were collected and five sub-samples from each collection were filtered through a cartridge filter. For the deep open ocean sample, separate sub-samples were also filtered through a membrane disc filter. In addition, deep open ocean sub-samples were also taken from five separate sampling bottles. Each sub-sample (29 in total) was analysed six times (giving 174 discrete measurements in total) and the within sub-sample precision was in the range 1.4–12.2%. There was no statistically significant difference for the deep, open ocean sample between the mean results obtained with the two different filter types or the single sample bottle versus separate sample bottle sub-samples. Application of classical ANOVA showed that the relative combined standard uncertainty for each of the six sampling strategies ranged from 2.3–3.8%. This approach did not include an estimation of sampling bias. Application of robust ANOVA to the deep open ocean samples showed that contributions to the total variance were 0% from the different sample collection and filtration strategies, 42% from the sub-sample precision and 58% from between sub-sample measurements.

Text
c6ay01551d - Version of Record
Download (419kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 August 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 August 2016
Published date: 7 October 2016
Organisations: Marine Biogeochemistry

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 406215
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/406215
ISSN: 1759-9660
PURE UUID: cb00c726-ade6-48c7-82bd-df67c67f8b3d
ORCID for Maeve C. Lohan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-3108

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Mar 2017 10:42
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert Clough
Author: Geerke H. Floor
Author: Christophe R. Quétel
Author: Angela Milne
Author: Maeve C. Lohan ORCID iD
Author: Paul J. Worsfold

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×