Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: Effect of backrest height
Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: Effect of backrest height
Backrests influence the comfort of seated people. With 21 subjects sitting with three backrest heights (no backrest, short backrest, high backrest) discomfort caused by lateral, roll, and fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation was investigated at frequencies between 0.25 and 1.0 Hz. With lateral oscillation, the short backrest reduced discomfort at frequencies less than 0.63 Hz and the high backrest reduced discomfort at frequencies less than 1.0 Hz. With roll oscillation, the high backrest reduced discomfort at frequencies less than 0.63 Hz, but increased discomfort at 1.0 Hz. With fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation, the short backrest reduced discomfort at 0.4 Hz and the high backrest reduced discomfort at 0.5 and 0.63 Hz. As predicted by current standards, a backrest can increase discomfort caused by high frequencies of vibration. However, a backrest can reduce discomfort caused by low frequencies, with the benefit depending on the frequency and direction of oscillation and backrest height.
Backrest, Discomfort, Vibration
51-61
Beard, George F.
7319e731-3fa5-4172-bbed-335df92d7e87
Griffin, Michael J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
1 May 2016
Beard, George F.
7319e731-3fa5-4172-bbed-335df92d7e87
Griffin, Michael J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
Beard, George F. and Griffin, Michael J.
(2016)
Discomfort of seated persons exposed to low frequency lateral and roll oscillation: Effect of backrest height.
Applied Ergonomics, 54, .
(doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.010).
Abstract
Backrests influence the comfort of seated people. With 21 subjects sitting with three backrest heights (no backrest, short backrest, high backrest) discomfort caused by lateral, roll, and fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation was investigated at frequencies between 0.25 and 1.0 Hz. With lateral oscillation, the short backrest reduced discomfort at frequencies less than 0.63 Hz and the high backrest reduced discomfort at frequencies less than 1.0 Hz. With roll oscillation, the high backrest reduced discomfort at frequencies less than 0.63 Hz, but increased discomfort at 1.0 Hz. With fully roll-compensated lateral oscillation, the short backrest reduced discomfort at 0.4 Hz and the high backrest reduced discomfort at 0.5 and 0.63 Hz. As predicted by current standards, a backrest can increase discomfort caused by high frequencies of vibration. However, a backrest can reduce discomfort caused by low frequencies, with the benefit depending on the frequency and direction of oscillation and backrest height.
Text
14787 GFB-MJG 2016 Effect of backrest_height_on_discomfort_with_lateral_and_roll_oscillation
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 November 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 December 2015
Published date: 1 May 2016
Keywords:
Backrest, Discomfort, Vibration
Organisations:
University of Southampton, Human Factors Research Unit
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 406283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/406283
ISSN: 0003-6870
PURE UUID: 2cfb37a8-8fb7-465b-9564-99a4d9454106
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Mar 2017 10:44
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 12:22
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
George F. Beard
Author:
Michael J. Griffin
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics