The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee
Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: A randomised controlled trial in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared CHART which employs 36 fractions of 1.5 Gy 3 times per day to give 54 Gy in 12 consecutive days with conventional radiotherapy-30 fractions of 2 Gy to a total dose of 60 Gy in 6 weeks. A total of 563 patients were entered between April 1990 and April 1995. This report is based upon the data updated to 1 April 1998.

RESULTS: The analysis of the mature data shows that the benefits previously reported have been maintained. Overall there was a 22% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 9% from 20 to 29% (P = 0.008) and a 21% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.033). In the large subgroup of patients with squamous cell cancer which accounted for 81% of the cases, there was a 30% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 13% from 20 to 33% (P = 0.0007) and a 27% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.012). Furthermore, in squamous carcinoma there was a 25% reduction in the relative risk of local and/or distant progression (P = 0.025) and 24% reduction in the relative risk of metastasis (P = 0.043). There was no evidence that CHART gave more or less benefit in any other subgroup.

CONCLUSION: This analysis of mature data confirms that CHART is superior to conventional radiotherapy in achieving local tumour control and survival in locally advanced NSCLC. This demonstrates the importance of cellular repopulation as a cause of failure in the radiotherapy of NSCLC. The reduction in the risk of metastasis confirms that improved local tumour control, even in lung cancer, can reduce the incidence of metastasis. This trial shows that control of local tumour can lead to an improvement in long term survival.

Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Dose Fractionation, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Dosage, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
0167-8140
137-48
Saunders, M.
bdbd3b73-bebb-4e39-89ed-f204b31d0612
Dische, S.
5ae3a621-2a29-44b9-b6db-9fdd9fea4e17
Barrett, A.
f8445313-d2bc-4ba3-bf3c-bf55d1b6e760
Harvey, A.
0fbcf100-4a45-4a0a-8672-9924c60818f7
Griffiths, G.
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Palmar, M.
de8b3677-8f7c-49ea-ad10-72c275de0946
Saunders, M.
bdbd3b73-bebb-4e39-89ed-f204b31d0612
Dische, S.
5ae3a621-2a29-44b9-b6db-9fdd9fea4e17
Barrett, A.
f8445313-d2bc-4ba3-bf3c-bf55d1b6e760
Harvey, A.
0fbcf100-4a45-4a0a-8672-9924c60818f7
Griffiths, G.
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Palmar, M.
de8b3677-8f7c-49ea-ad10-72c275de0946

Saunders, M., Dische, S., Barrett, A., Harvey, A., Griffiths, G. and Palmar, M. (1999) Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 52 (2), 137-48. (doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00087-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHOD: A randomised controlled trial in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared CHART which employs 36 fractions of 1.5 Gy 3 times per day to give 54 Gy in 12 consecutive days with conventional radiotherapy-30 fractions of 2 Gy to a total dose of 60 Gy in 6 weeks. A total of 563 patients were entered between April 1990 and April 1995. This report is based upon the data updated to 1 April 1998.

RESULTS: The analysis of the mature data shows that the benefits previously reported have been maintained. Overall there was a 22% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 9% from 20 to 29% (P = 0.008) and a 21% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.033). In the large subgroup of patients with squamous cell cancer which accounted for 81% of the cases, there was a 30% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 13% from 20 to 33% (P = 0.0007) and a 27% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.012). Furthermore, in squamous carcinoma there was a 25% reduction in the relative risk of local and/or distant progression (P = 0.025) and 24% reduction in the relative risk of metastasis (P = 0.043). There was no evidence that CHART gave more or less benefit in any other subgroup.

CONCLUSION: This analysis of mature data confirms that CHART is superior to conventional radiotherapy in achieving local tumour control and survival in locally advanced NSCLC. This demonstrates the importance of cellular repopulation as a cause of failure in the radiotherapy of NSCLC. The reduction in the risk of metastasis confirms that improved local tumour control, even in lung cancer, can reduce the incidence of metastasis. This trial shows that control of local tumour can lead to an improvement in long term survival.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 June 1999
Published date: 1 August 1999
Keywords: Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Dose Fractionation, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Radiotherapy, Radiotherapy Dosage, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial
Organisations: Clinical Trials Unit

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 406327
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/406327
ISSN: 0167-8140
PURE UUID: 922cfeae-6351-4067-ae78-835f88414fa1
ORCID for G. Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Mar 2017 10:44
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 04:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M. Saunders
Author: S. Dische
Author: A. Barrett
Author: A. Harvey
Author: G. Griffiths ORCID iD
Author: M. Palmar

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×