The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Metaphysical interdependence

Metaphysical interdependence
Metaphysical interdependence
It is commonly assumed that grounding relations are asymmetric. Here I develop and argue for a theory of metaphysical structure that takes grounding to be nonsymmetric rather than asymmetric. Even without infinite descending chains of dependence, it might be that every entity is grounded in some other entity. Having first addressed an immediate objection to the position under discussion, I introduce two examples of symmetric grounding. I give three arguments for the view that grounding is nonsymmetric (I call this view ‘metaphysical interdependence’). These arguments are: (i) that metaphysical interdependence is the only theory able to reconcile competing intuitions about grounding; (ii) that it is the only theory consistent with both ‘gunk’ and ‘junk’; and (iii) that offers a satisfactory solution to the problem concerning whether or not grounding is itself grounded.
38-56
Oxford University Press
Thompson, Naomi
b382645c-7f77-428b-871a-8552466ec04d
Thompson, Naomi
b382645c-7f77-428b-871a-8552466ec04d

Thompson, Naomi (2016) Metaphysical interdependence. In, Reality Making. (Mind Association Occasional Series) Oxford. Oxford University Press, pp. 38-56.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that grounding relations are asymmetric. Here I develop and argue for a theory of metaphysical structure that takes grounding to be nonsymmetric rather than asymmetric. Even without infinite descending chains of dependence, it might be that every entity is grounded in some other entity. Having first addressed an immediate objection to the position under discussion, I introduce two examples of symmetric grounding. I give three arguments for the view that grounding is nonsymmetric (I call this view ‘metaphysical interdependence’). These arguments are: (i) that metaphysical interdependence is the only theory able to reconcile competing intuitions about grounding; (ii) that it is the only theory consistent with both ‘gunk’ and ‘junk’; and (iii) that offers a satisfactory solution to the problem concerning whether or not grounding is itself grounded.

Text
24df9267-afb2-4805-97c9-e232063aa22d - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
03-Jago-ch02-drv - Proof
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2016
Organisations: Philosophy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 406439
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/406439
PURE UUID: 24df9267-afb2-4805-97c9-e232063aa22d
ORCID for Naomi Thompson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8605-6731

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Mar 2017 10:47
Last modified: 13 Sep 2024 01:49

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×