Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care
Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care
Objective: To assess the impact of leaflets encouraging patients to raise concerns and to discuss symptoms or other health related issues in the consultation.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Five general practices in three settings in the United Kingdom.
Participants: 636 consecutive patients, aged 16-80 years, randomised to receive a general leaflet, a depression leaflet, both, or neither.
Main outcomes: Mean item score on the medical interview satisfaction scale, consultation time, prescribing, referral, and investigation.
Results: The general leaflet increased patient satisfaction and was more effective with shorter consultations (leaflet 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.08; time 0.31, 0.0 to 0.06; interaction between both -0.045, -0.08 to—0.009), with similar results for subscales related to the different aspects of communication. Thus for a 10 minute consultation the leaflet increased satisfaction by 7% (seven centile points) and for a five minute consultation by 14%. The leaflet overall caused a small non-significant increase in consultation time (0.36 minutes, -0.54 to 1.26). Although there was no change in prescribing or referral, a general leaflet increased the numbers of investigations (odds ratio 1.43, 1.00 to 2.05), which persisted when controlling for the major potential confounders of perceived medical need and patient preference (1.87, 1.10 to 3.19). Most of excess investigations were not thought strongly needed by the doctor or the patient. The depression leaflet had no significant effect on any outcome.
Conclusions: Encouraging patients to raise issues and to discuss symptoms and other health related issues in the consultation improves their satisfaction and perceptions of communication, particularly in short consultations. Doctors do, however, need to elicit expectations to prevent needless investigations.
441-444
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Dorward, Martina
ede98eab-1027-4a21-a38c-3bccb7c71e06
Warner, Greg
72005519-1aa0-42da-b370-7ebd99792539
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Stephens, Katharine
03f444ea-c86c-43ba-99af-09ac90a8de09
Senior, Jane
466f62e7-dce3-4e6c-a73d-53357d05f550
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
13 February 2004
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Dorward, Martina
ede98eab-1027-4a21-a38c-3bccb7c71e06
Warner, Greg
72005519-1aa0-42da-b370-7ebd99792539
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Stephens, Katharine
03f444ea-c86c-43ba-99af-09ac90a8de09
Senior, Jane
466f62e7-dce3-4e6c-a73d-53357d05f550
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Little, Paul, Dorward, Martina, Warner, Greg, Moore, Michael, Stephens, Katharine, Senior, Jane and Kendrick, Tony
(2004)
Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care.
BMJ, 328 (7437), .
(doi:10.1136/bmj.37999.716157.44).
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of leaflets encouraging patients to raise concerns and to discuss symptoms or other health related issues in the consultation.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Five general practices in three settings in the United Kingdom.
Participants: 636 consecutive patients, aged 16-80 years, randomised to receive a general leaflet, a depression leaflet, both, or neither.
Main outcomes: Mean item score on the medical interview satisfaction scale, consultation time, prescribing, referral, and investigation.
Results: The general leaflet increased patient satisfaction and was more effective with shorter consultations (leaflet 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.08; time 0.31, 0.0 to 0.06; interaction between both -0.045, -0.08 to—0.009), with similar results for subscales related to the different aspects of communication. Thus for a 10 minute consultation the leaflet increased satisfaction by 7% (seven centile points) and for a five minute consultation by 14%. The leaflet overall caused a small non-significant increase in consultation time (0.36 minutes, -0.54 to 1.26). Although there was no change in prescribing or referral, a general leaflet increased the numbers of investigations (odds ratio 1.43, 1.00 to 2.05), which persisted when controlling for the major potential confounders of perceived medical need and patient preference (1.87, 1.10 to 3.19). Most of excess investigations were not thought strongly needed by the doctor or the patient. The depression leaflet had no significant effect on any outcome.
Conclusions: Encouraging patients to raise issues and to discuss symptoms and other health related issues in the consultation improves their satisfaction and perceptions of communication, particularly in short consultations. Doctors do, however, need to elicit expectations to prevent needless investigations.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 13 February 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 40661
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/40661
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: be119656-b467-424b-8b7d-9fa516d5c49d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jul 2006
Last modified: 11 Jul 2024 01:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Martina Dorward
Author:
Greg Warner
Author:
Katharine Stephens
Author:
Jane Senior
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics