A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944
A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944
Over the past decade, Crimean Tatars started to express more robustly their requests for the international recognition of the 1944 Mass Deportation as the crime of genocide. While it can be said, even prima facie, that the 1944 Deportation falls under the scope of the current definition of crimes against humanity, making a similar kind of claim with the same immediateness is unlikely in terms of the crime of genocide owing to the narrowly constructed legal definition. Moreover, the principle of non-retroactivity of laws poses a further challenge in the consideration of both genocide and crimes against humanity. This paper will try to answer two interconnected questions: Is it a legally plausible case to characterize the 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity? And, are there any differences between the legal characterization of 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity in terms of their possible consequences?
Crimean Tatars; Crimean Deportation; Genocide Law; Crimes Against Humanity; Non-retroactivity of Laws; International Criminal Law
95-137
Uraz, Onur
66eaa6d6-9fa7-4dfe-834e-6d141269b63e
2015
Uraz, Onur
66eaa6d6-9fa7-4dfe-834e-6d141269b63e
Uraz, Onur
(2015)
A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944.
International Crimes and History, 16, .
Abstract
Over the past decade, Crimean Tatars started to express more robustly their requests for the international recognition of the 1944 Mass Deportation as the crime of genocide. While it can be said, even prima facie, that the 1944 Deportation falls under the scope of the current definition of crimes against humanity, making a similar kind of claim with the same immediateness is unlikely in terms of the crime of genocide owing to the narrowly constructed legal definition. Moreover, the principle of non-retroactivity of laws poses a further challenge in the consideration of both genocide and crimes against humanity. This paper will try to answer two interconnected questions: Is it a legally plausible case to characterize the 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity? And, are there any differences between the legal characterization of 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity in terms of their possible consequences?
Text
ICH UST -16 -Onur Uraz
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2015
Keywords:
Crimean Tatars; Crimean Deportation; Genocide Law; Crimes Against Humanity; Non-retroactivity of Laws; International Criminal Law
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 406774
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/406774
PURE UUID: b37682bb-f1d7-44c0-bf58-93994fefe509
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Mar 2017 02:08
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 12:29
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Onur Uraz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics