The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944

A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944
A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944
Over the past decade, Crimean Tatars started to express more robustly their requests for the international recognition of the 1944 Mass Deportation as the crime of genocide. While it can be said, even prima facie, that the 1944 Deportation falls under the scope of the current definition of crimes against humanity, making a similar kind of claim with the same immediateness is unlikely in terms of the crime of genocide owing to the narrowly constructed legal definition. Moreover, the principle of non-retroactivity of laws poses a further challenge in the consideration of both genocide and crimes against humanity. This paper will try to answer two interconnected questions: Is it a legally plausible case to characterize the 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity? And, are there any differences between the legal characterization of 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity in terms of their possible consequences?
Crimean Tatars; Crimean Deportation; Genocide Law; Crimes Against Humanity; Non-retroactivity of Laws; International Criminal Law
95-137
Uraz, Onur
66eaa6d6-9fa7-4dfe-834e-6d141269b63e
Uraz, Onur
66eaa6d6-9fa7-4dfe-834e-6d141269b63e

Uraz, Onur (2015) A legal analysis of the Crimean Tatar Deportation of 1944. International Crimes and History, 16, 95-137.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Over the past decade, Crimean Tatars started to express more robustly their requests for the international recognition of the 1944 Mass Deportation as the crime of genocide. While it can be said, even prima facie, that the 1944 Deportation falls under the scope of the current definition of crimes against humanity, making a similar kind of claim with the same immediateness is unlikely in terms of the crime of genocide owing to the narrowly constructed legal definition. Moreover, the principle of non-retroactivity of laws poses a further challenge in the consideration of both genocide and crimes against humanity. This paper will try to answer two interconnected questions: Is it a legally plausible case to characterize the 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity? And, are there any differences between the legal characterization of 1944 Deportation as genocide or crimes against humanity in terms of their possible consequences?

Text
ICH UST -16 -Onur Uraz - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2015
Keywords: Crimean Tatars; Crimean Deportation; Genocide Law; Crimes Against Humanity; Non-retroactivity of Laws; International Criminal Law
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 406774
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/406774
PURE UUID: b37682bb-f1d7-44c0-bf58-93994fefe509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Mar 2017 02:08
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 12:29

Export record

Contributors

Author: Onur Uraz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×