Testing the current models of third language acquisition
Testing the current models of third language acquisition
In this chapter, we argue that another factor should be brought into the general
picture of third and additional language acquisition: the comprehensible
linguistic input. Predictions of current models have been predominantly based
on the cognitive-psychological prominence of the three languages (native or not,
adult-onset or not, naturalistic or instructed, proficient of not) as well as on the
structural linguistic properties to be acquired, which may overlap or contrast.
We argue that even keeping these two factors constant, discrepancies in learning
outcomes still arise, which have to be explained by the linguistic experience of
the learners. We support our arguments with results from two recently published
studies, which document diverging developmental paths for two properties that
should have been acquired in a similar manner.
third language acquisition, comprehensible input, cross-linguistic influence, null objects, Topicalization
63–84
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Slabakova, Roumyana
1bda11ce-ce3d-4146-8ae3-4a486b6f5bde
Garcia Mayo, Maria del Pilar
3146b2aa-75cf-4712-8c98-a4e9459f4a20
June 2017
Slabakova, Roumyana
1bda11ce-ce3d-4146-8ae3-4a486b6f5bde
Garcia Mayo, Maria del Pilar
3146b2aa-75cf-4712-8c98-a4e9459f4a20
Slabakova, Roumyana and Garcia Mayo, Maria del Pilar
(2017)
Testing the current models of third language acquisition.
In,
Angelovska, Tanja and Hahn, Angela
(eds.)
L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New developments, and Implications.
(Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, BPA 5)
Amsterdam.
John Benjamins Publishing Company, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
In this chapter, we argue that another factor should be brought into the general
picture of third and additional language acquisition: the comprehensible
linguistic input. Predictions of current models have been predominantly based
on the cognitive-psychological prominence of the three languages (native or not,
adult-onset or not, naturalistic or instructed, proficient of not) as well as on the
structural linguistic properties to be acquired, which may overlap or contrast.
We argue that even keeping these two factors constant, discrepancies in learning
outcomes still arise, which have to be explained by the linguistic experience of
the learners. We support our arguments with results from two recently published
studies, which document diverging developmental paths for two properties that
should have been acquired in a similar manner.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: January 2017
Published date: June 2017
Keywords:
third language acquisition, comprehensible input, cross-linguistic influence, null objects, Topicalization
Organisations:
Modern Languages and Linguistics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 407363
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/407363
ISSN: 2352-0531
PURE UUID: 3fc8a974-f346-4c0f-a9a7-35199d4e1bad
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Apr 2017 01:07
Last modified: 09 Mar 2024 02:47
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Maria del Pilar Garcia Mayo
Editor:
Tanja Angelovska
Editor:
Angela Hahn
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics